Wednesday, October 31, 2018

Inaccuracy or Mistake in Notice would make Assessment Invalid: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

A two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court has held that the inaccuracy or mistake in a notice issued under section 147 of the Income Tax Act would make the same legally not valid. In the instant case, the Assessing Officer initiated re-assessment proceedings against the assessee by finding that in the financial year F.Y. […]

The post Inaccuracy or Mistake in Notice would make Assessment Invalid: Delhi HC [Read Judgment] appeared first on Taxscan | Simplifying Tax Laws.



from Taxscan | Simplifying Tax Laws https://ift.tt/2RrXJg3

Kerala HC directs GST Dept to release detained Goods as the Discrepancy in E-Way Bill was a Clerical Error [Read Judgment]

In a recent ruling, the Kerala High Court directed the State GST officials to consider release of goods in view of the CBIC Circular No. 64/38/2018-GST, dated 14th September 2018 since the discrepancy in the E-Way Bill was due to a typographical error. The petitioners’ sole grievance was that while generating e-way bill for the […]

The post Kerala HC directs GST Dept to release detained Goods as the Discrepancy in E-Way Bill was a Clerical Error [Read Judgment] appeared first on Taxscan | Simplifying Tax Laws.



from Taxscan | Simplifying Tax Laws https://ift.tt/2RsSXPw

Amendment in GST Registration Cancellation form

Amendment in GST Registration Cancellation form

By Notification No. 60/2018 – Central Tax Dated 30th October, 2018 , Govt has amended GST REG-16,(Application for Cancellation of Registration)

Relevant Wording of Sr No 7 GST REG 16  before Amendment

Relevant Wording of Sr No 7 GST REG 16  After Amendment

In the said rules, in FORM GST REG-16,-

(a) against serial number 7, for the heading, the following heading shall be substituted, namely:-

“In case of transfer, merger of business and change in constitution leading to change in PAN, particulars of registration of entity in which merged, amalgamated, transferred, etc.”;

Relevant Instructions of GST REG 16  Before Amendment

In case of death of sole proprietor, application shall be made by the legal heir / successor manually before the concerned tax authorities. The new entity in which the applicant proposes to amalgamate itself shall register with the tax authority before submission of the application for cancellation. This application shall be made only after that the new entity is registered.
Before applying for cancellation, please file your tax return due for the tax period in which the effective date of surrender of registration falls.

Relevant Instructions of GST REG 16  After Amendment

In the said rules, in FORM GST REG-16,-

(b) in the instruction, after the Table, for the paragraphs beginning with the words “In case of death of sole proprietor” and ending with the words “surrender of registration falls”, the following paragraphs shall be substituted, namely:-

“In case of death of sole proprietor, application shall be made by the legal heir / successor before the concerned tax authorities. The new entity in which the applicant proposes to amalgamate itself shall register with the tax authority before submission of the application for cancellation. This application shall be made
only after the new entity is registered.
Before applying for cancellation, please file your tax return due for the tax period in which the effective date of surrender of registration falls or furnish an application to the effect that no taxable supplies have been made during the intervening period (i.e. from the date of registration to the date of application for cancellation of registration).”.

The post Amendment in GST Registration Cancellation form appeared first on Tax Heal.



from Tax Heal https://ift.tt/2QatnPb

Which Purchase details not required in GSTR 4 of Composition Scheme Deal...

Purchase Details not required in GSTR 4 ( serial No 4A of Table 4 )

Purchase Details not required in GSTR 4 ( serial No 4A of Table 4 )

Form GSTR-4 is for Quarterly return for registered person opting for composition levy.

Now composition scheme dealer is not required to give details of Serial No 4A. of Table 4 i.e  Inward supplies received from a registered supplier (other than supplies attracting reverse charge)  in GSTR 4

By Notification No. 60/2018 – Central Tax Dated  30th October, 2018 Govt has amended the Instruction No 10 of Form GSTR 4 as follow :-

“10. Information against the Serial 4A of Table 4 shall not be furnished.”.

Serial No 4A of Table 4 was as follow

 

The post Purchase Details not required in GSTR 4 ( serial No 4A of Table 4 ) appeared first on Tax Heal.



from Tax Heal https://ift.tt/2zi4WIo

November 2018 Due Dates for GST and Income Tax : जीएसटी और आयकर ( नवंब...

TDS Provisions won’t attract when Consideration is paid in Kind: ITAT [Read Order]

The Chandigarh bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the provisions of tax deduction at source ( TDS ) under Section 194C of the Income Tax Act would not applicable in a case where the consideration is paid in kind, not in money. In the instant case, the assessee is a […]

The post TDS Provisions won’t attract when Consideration is paid in Kind: ITAT [Read Order] appeared first on Taxscan | Simplifying Tax Laws.



from Taxscan | Simplifying Tax Laws https://ift.tt/2CVMFnH

GST and Income Tax Due Dates Calendar for November 2018

GST and Income Tax Due Dates Calendar for November 2018

7 November 2018 –

Due date for deposit of Tax deducted/collected for the month of October, 2018. However, all sum deducted/collected by an office of the government shall be paid to the credit of the Central Government on the same day where tax is paid without production of an Income-tax Challan

14 November 2018 –

Due date for issue of TDS Certificate for tax deducted under section 194-IA in the month of September, 2018.

Due date for issue of TDS Certificate for tax deducted under section 194-IB in the month of September, 2018.

15 November 2018 –

Quarterly TDS certificate (in respect of tax deducted for payments other than salary) for the quarter ending September 30, 2018

Due date for furnishing of Form 24G by an office of the Government where TDS for the month of October, 2018 has been paid without the production of a challan

20th November 2018 

Due date for GSTR 3B for October 2018 Refer Notification No 34/2018 Central Tax Dated 10th August, 2018:

30 November 2018 

Due date for furnishing of challan-cum-statement in respect of tax deducted under section 194-IA in the month of October, 2018

Due date for furnishing of challan-cum-statement in respect of tax deducted under section 194-IB in the month of October, 2018

Annual return of income for the assessment year 2018-19 in the case of an assessee if he/it is required to submit a report under section 92E pertaining to international or specified domestic transaction(s)

Audit report under section 44AB for the assessment year 2018-19 in the case of an assessee who is also required to submit a report pertaining to international or specified domestic transactions under section 92E

Report to be furnished in Form 3CEB in respect of international transaction and specified domestic transaction

Report in Form No. 3CEAA by a constituent entity of an international group for the accounting year 2017-18

Country-By-Country Report in Form No. 3CEAD by a parent entity or an alternate reporting entity or any other constituent entity, resident in India, for the accounting year 2016-17.

Statement of income distribution by Venture Capital Company or venture capital fund in respect of income distributed during 2017-18

Statement to be furnished in Form No. 64D by Alternative Investment Fund (AIF) to Principal CIT or CIT in respect of income distributed (during previous year 2017-18) to units holders

Due date to exercise option of safe harbour rules for international transaction by furnishing Form 3CEFA

Due date to exercise option of safe harbour rules for specified domestic transaction by furnishing Form 3CEFB

Due date for filing of statement of income distributed by business trust to unit holders during the financial year 2017-18. This statement is required to be filed electronically to Principal CIT or CIT in form No. 64A

Due date for e-filing of report (in Form No. 3CEJ) by an eligible investment fund in respect of arm’s length price of the remuneration paid to the fund manager.

Application in Form 9A for exercising the option available under Explanation to section 11(1) to apply income of previous year in the next year or in future (if the assessee is required to submit return of income on November 30, 2018)

Statement in Form no. 10 to be furnished to accumulate income for future application under section 10(21) or 11(2) (if the assessee is required to submit return of income on November 30, 2018)

Submit copy of audit of accounts to the Secretary, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research in case company is eligible for weighted deduction undersection 35(2AB) [if company has any international/specified domestic transaction]

Statement by scientific research association, university, college or other association or Indian scientific research company as required by rules 5D, 5E and 5F (if due date of submission of return of income is November 30, 2018)

Due date for claiming foreign tax credit, upload statement of foreign income offered for tax for the previous year 2017-18 and of foreign tax deducted or paid on such income in Form no. 67. (if due date of submission of return of income is November 30, 2018).

The post GST and Income Tax Due Dates Calendar for November 2018 appeared first on Tax Heal.



from Tax Heal https://ift.tt/2JA2MIV

GST on MSME Booklet : Download

GST on MSME Booklet

Download GST on MSME Booklet Click here

The post GST on MSME Booklet : Download appeared first on Tax Heal.



from Tax Heal https://ift.tt/2OhHVuy

Income Tax and GST Return filing, No Extension and Site Shutdown: CAs are under Pressure

The Chartered Accountants all over the country are under huge pressure as the due date for filing income tax audit report and GSTR-1 is expiring today and the Government is in no mood to extend the due dates. To add more tensions, the GST portal was not working properly afternoon, which made the day more […]

The post Income Tax and GST Return filing, No Extension and Site Shutdown: CAs are under Pressure appeared first on Taxscan | Simplifying Tax Laws.



from Taxscan | Simplifying Tax Laws https://ift.tt/2SxCBGE

GST Practitioners Exam FAQs , Syllabus and Pattern

Examination of GST Practitioners

Rule 83A of CGST Rules 2017 inserted by CGST (13th Amendment ) Rules 2018  Dated 30th October, 2018

Video Tutorial on Rule 83A of CGST Rules 2017

Who is required to pass GST Practioners Exam ?

Examination of Goods and Services Tax Practitioners.-

Every person referred to in clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of rule 83 and who is enrolled as a goods and services tax practitioner under sub-rule (2) of the said rule, shall pass an examination as per sub-rule (3) of the said rule.

[Rule 83A (1) of CGST Rules 2017 ]

Who will Conduct GST Practitioner Exam ?

The National Academy of Customs, Indirect Taxes and Narcotics (hereinafter referred to as “NACIN”) shall conduct the examination.

[Rule 83A (2) of CGST Rules 2017 ]

What will be the Frequency of examination for GST Practitioner ?

The examination shall be conducted twice in a year as per the schedule of the examination published by NACIN every year on the official websites of the Board, NACIN, common portal, GST Council Secretariat and in the leading English and regional newspapers.

[Rule 83A (3) of CGST Rules 2017 ]

How to take registration and pay fees for GST Practitioner Exam ?

Registration for the examination and payment of fee.-

(i) A person who is required to pass the examination shall register online on a website specified by NACIN.

(ii) A person who registers for the examination shall pay examination fee as specified by NACIN, and the amount for the same and the manner of its payment shall be specified by NACIN on the official websites of the Board, NACIN and common portal.

[Rule 83A (4) of CGST Rules 2017 ]

Where will GST Practitioner Exam be conducted ?

Examination centers

The examination shall be held across India at the designated centers.

The candidate shall be given an option to choose from the list of centers as provided by NACIN at the time of registration.

[Rule 83A (5) of CGST Rules 2017 ]

How many attempts are allowed to pass GST Practitioner Exam ?

Rule 83A (6) of CGST Rules 2017  :

 Period for passing the examination and number of attempts allowed.

(i) A person enrolled as a goods and services tax practitioner in terms of sub-rule (2) of rule 83 is required to pass the examination within two years of enrolment:

Provided that if a person is enrolled as a goods and services tax practitioner before 1st of July 2018, he shall get one more year to pass the examination:

Provided further that for a goods and services tax practitioner to whom the provisions of clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of rule 83 apply, the period to pass the examination will be as specified in the second proviso of sub-rule (3) of said rule.  [ i.e within a period of eighteen months from the appointed date 01.07.2017 ]

(ii) A person required to pass the examination may avail of any number of attempts but these attempts shall be within the period as specified in clause (i).

(iii) A person shall register and pay the requisite fee every time he intends to appear at the examination.

(iv) In case the goods and services tax practitioner having applied for appearing in the examination is prevented from availing one or more attempts due to unforeseen circumstances such as critical illness, accident or natural calamity, he may make a request in writing to the jurisdictional Commissioner for granting him one additional attempt to pass the examination, within thirty days of conduct of the said examination. NACIN may consider such requests on merits based on recommendations of the jurisdictional Commissioner.

What will be the nature of GST Practitioner Exam ?

Rule 83A (7) of CGST Rules 2017  :

 Nature of examination.

The examination shall be a Computer Based Test.

It shall have one question paper consisting of Multiple Choice Questions.

The pattern and syllabus are specified in Annexure-A.

Annexure-A
[See sub-rule 7]
Pattern and Syllabus of the Examination

PAPER: GST Law & Procedures:
Time allowed: 2 hours and 30 minutes
Number of Multiple Choice Questions: 100
Language of Questions: English and Hindi
Maximum marks: 200
Qualifying marks: 100
No negative marking

 

Syllabus:
1 The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
2 The Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
3 All The State Goods and Services Tax Acts, 2017
4 The Union territory Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
5 The Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017
6 The Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017
7 The Integrated Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017
8 All The State Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017
9 Notifications, Circulars and orders issued from time to time under the said Acts and Rules.”.

What will be the Qualifying marks for GST Practitioner Exam ?

Rule 83A (8) of CGST Rules 2017  :

Qualifying marks.- A person shall be required to secure fifty per cent. of the total marks

What are Guidelines for GST Practitioner Exam ?

Rule 83A (9) of CGST Rules 2017  :

   Guidelines for the candidates.-

(i) NACIN shall issue examination guidelines covering issues such as procedure of registration, payment of fee, nature of identity documents, provision of admit card, manner of reporting at the examination center, prohibition on possession of certain items in the examination center, procedure of making representation and the manner of its disposal.

(ii) Any person who is or has been found to be indulging in unfair means or practices shall be dealt in accordance with the provisions of sub-rule (10). An illustrative list of use of unfair means or practices by a person is as under: –

(a) obtaining support for his candidature by any means;
(b) impersonating;
(c) submitting fabricated documents;

(d) resorting to any unfair means or practices in connection with the examination or in connection with the result of the examination;
(e) found in possession of any paper, book, note or any other material, the use of which is not permitted in the examination center;
(f) communicating with others or exchanging calculators, chits, papers etc. (on which something is written);
(g) misbehaving in the examination center in any manner;
(h) tampering with the hardware and/or software deployed; and
(i) attempting to commit or, as the case may be, to abet in the commission of all or any of the acts specified in the foregoing clauses

How can a person be disqualified from GST Practitioner Exam ?

Rule 83A (10) of CGST Rules 2017  :

 Disqualification of person using unfair means or practice.– If any person is or has been found to be indulging in use of unfair means or practices, NACIN may, after considering his representation, if any, declare him disqualified for the examination.

How results will be declared for GST Practitioner Exam ?

Rule 83A (11) of CGST Rules 2017  :

Declaration of result.- NACIN shall declare the results within one month of the conduct of examination on the official websites of the Board, NACIN, GST Council Secretariat, common portal and State Tax Department of the respective States or Union territories, if any.

The results shall also be communicated to the applicants by e-mail and/or by post.

What can be done if person is not satisfied with result of GST Practitioner Exam ?

Rule 83A (12) of CGST Rules 2017  :

Handling representations.– A person not satisfied with his result may represent in writing, clearly specifying the reasons therein to NACIN or the jurisdictional Commissioner as per the procedure established by NACIN on the official websites of the Board, NACIN and common portal.

Whether any relaxation can be given for GST Practitioner Exam ?

Rule 83A (13) of CGST Rules 2017  :

Power to relax.- Where the Board or State Tax Commissioner is of the opinion that it is necessary or expedient to do so, it may, on the recommendations of the Council, relax any of the provisions of this rule with respect to any class or category of persons

what is the meaning of  jurisdictional Commissioner for GST Practitioner Exam ?

Rule 83A of CGST Rules 2017

Explanation :- For the purposes of this sub-rule, the expressions –

(a) “jurisdictional Commissioner” means the Commissioner having jurisdiction over the place declared as address in the application for enrolment as the GST Practitioner in FORM GST PCT-1.

It shall refer to the Commissioner of Central Tax if the enrolling authority in FORM GST PCT-1 has been selected as Centre,
or the Commissioner of State Tax if the enrolling authority in FORM GST PCT1 has been selected as State;

what is the meaning of NACIN for GST Practitioner Exam ?

Rule 83A of CGST Rules 2017

Explanation :- For the purposes of this sub-rule, the expressions –

(b) NACIN means as notified by notification No. 24/2018-Central Tax, dated 28.05.2018

 

 

 

 

 

(2) The National Academy of Customs, Indirect Taxes and Narcotics (hereinafter referred to as “NACIN”) shall conduct the examination.

 

 

 

The post GST Practitioners Exam FAQs , Syllabus and Pattern appeared first on Tax Heal.



from Tax Heal https://ift.tt/2JtFNPy

New Rule for GST Practitioner Exam : जीएसटी प्रैक्टिशनर परीक्षा के लिए ...

Absence of Vehicle Number in E-Way Bill: Kerala HC directs release of Goods by furnishing BG and Bond

The Kerala High Court, while considering a bunch of petitions challenging the detention of goods for not containing the vehicle details in the E-Way Bill, ordered to direct the goods by paying sufficient bank guarantee and bond. The petitioners are the transporters. When they had been carrying goods, the respondent State Tax Officer intercepted them […]

The post Absence of Vehicle Number in E-Way Bill: Kerala HC directs release of Goods by furnishing BG and Bond appeared first on Taxscan | Simplifying Tax Laws.



from Taxscan | Simplifying Tax Laws https://ift.tt/2EVypOp

Karnataka High Court imposes One Lakh Cost on Commissioner (Appeals) for Breach of Judicial Discipline [Read Order]

The Karnataka High Court, last week imposed a cost of one lakh rupees on the Commissioner of Service Tax (Appeals) for the breach of judicial discipline. In the instant case, the petitioner-assessee claimed the refund of tax on account of the export of services rendered by it. The issue had already disposed of by the […]

The post Karnataka High Court imposes One Lakh Cost on Commissioner (Appeals) for Breach of Judicial Discipline [Read Order] appeared first on Taxscan | Simplifying Tax Laws.



from Taxscan | Simplifying Tax Laws https://ift.tt/2CSKpNR

Breaking: Gauhati HC seeks response from CBDT on Tax Audit Date Extension, No Interim Relief

The Gauhati High Court has heard the petition seeking extension of due date of tax Audit Report under the Income Tax Act where the Court directed the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) to submit their version. It was argued on behalf of the tax Bar Association by advocates D Saikia and Ms.  M L […]

The post Breaking: Gauhati HC seeks response from CBDT on Tax Audit Date Extension, No Interim Relief appeared first on Taxscan | Simplifying Tax Laws.



from Taxscan | Simplifying Tax Laws https://ift.tt/2ABSvZz

Regulation on Auditors & Audit Firms: Experts Committee suggests to give more Powers to NFRA

The Committee of Experts has submitted its report on Regulating audit firms and the Networks to the Government of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Corporate Affairs. The Committee was constituted on April 20, 2018 pursuant to the directions of the Supreme Court in the matter of S. Sukumar versus The Secretary, Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. […]

The post Regulation on Auditors & Audit Firms: Experts Committee suggests to give more Powers to NFRA appeared first on Taxscan | Simplifying Tax Laws.



from Taxscan | Simplifying Tax Laws https://ift.tt/2Q6HogH

No Income Tax Exemption for PF interest on accumulated balance after retirement : ITAT

e are of the considered opinion that the withdrawal to the extent of the accumulated balance (viz., contributions plus interest) up to the retirement of the assessee’s i.e., 1/4/2002 of Rs.37,93,888/- is eligible for exemption u/s 10(12) of the Act .

However in respect of the accrued interest of Rs. 44,07,195/-from 1/4/2002 to 11/4/2011 on the accumulated balance of Rs.37,93,588/- as on 1/4/2002, the same has accrued to the assessee after he retired from Wipro Ltd., and it cannot be said that such accrual of the interest was qua an employee. The exemption u/s 10(12) of the Act is limited to the accumulated balance due and payable to an employee up-to the date of retirement/end of employment. In this view of the matter, we are of the considered opinion that the accumulated interest of Rs.44,07,195/- post-retirement of the assessee on 1/4/2002 is not eligible for exemption u/s 10(12) of the Act. We therefore hold that the AO was right in holding that the said interest was exigible to tax in the assessee’s hands. However, since the assessee is following mercantile system of accounting and to bring to tax the correct income in the hands relevant period of accrual, we direct the AO to bring this amount of accrued interest of Rs.44,07,195/- on P.F balance for the period 1/4/2002 to 11/4/2011 to tax in the assessee’s hands in the respective asst. years in which the interest accrued, as per the working in the table in page 15 of the order of assessment,

IN THE ITAT BANGALORE BENCH ‘B’

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1(2)(1), Bengaluru

v.

Dilip Ranjrekar

SUNIL KUMAR YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER
AND JASON P BOAZ, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

IT APPEAL NO. 858(BANG) OF 2016
CO. NO. 28 (BANG) OF 2017
[ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13]

NOVEMBER  10, 2017

Smt. Padmameenakshi, JCIT for the Appellant. H.N. Khincha, C.A. for the Respondent.

ORDER

Jason P Boaz, Accountant Member – This appeal by Revenue is directed against the order of the CIT(A)-1, Bangalore, dated 28/1/2016 for asst. year 2012-13. The assessee has also filed cross objections in this regard.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are as under:-

3. The assessee, a consultant, filed the return of income for asst. year 2012-13 on 29/9/2012 declaring income of Rs.1,18,03,300/-. The case was taken up for scrutiny and the assessment completed u/s. 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) vide order, dated 19/2/2015, wherein the assessee’s income was determined at Rs.5,16,93,547/- in view of the following additions/disallowances:—

(i) Long-Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of property at Pune on account of denial of exemption u/s. 54 of the Act and other variations in computation of capital gains – 3,16,74,073/-
(ii) P.F accumulated Balance – 37,93,588/-
(iii) Interest thereon – 44,07,195/-
(iv) Annuity from LIC – 15,391/-

2.2 Aggrieved by the order of assessment, dated 19/2/2015 for asst. year 2012-13, the assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT(A) – 1, Bangalore. The ld CIT(A) disposed the assessee’s appeal vide order, dated 28/1/2016 allowing partial relief. In this order, inter alia, the ld CIT(A) deleted the addition made by the Assessing Officer (‘AO’) on account of denial of exemption u/s. 54 of the Act, but has not rendered any finding on the variations made by the AO to the computation of LTCG. In respect of the addition on account of withdrawal from PF amount, the ld CIT(A) has deleted the entire addition of Rs.82,00,783/-without rendering any finding in respect of the interest received on PF balance.

3. Aggrieved by the order of the CIT(A)-1, Bangalore, dated 28/1/2016 for asst. year 2012-13, Revenue has preferred this appeal raising the following grounds:-

“1. The order of the learned CIT (Appeals), insofar as it is prejudicial to the interest of revenue, is opposed to law and the facts and circumstances of the case.

2. The CIT(Appeals) erred in giving relief to the assessee by holding that the entire amount due in an EPF account whenever drawn is not to be included in the income of the assessee, without considering that the benefit u/s.10(12) of the Income-tax Act shall be limited to the employees only and the further income generated from the investment of terminal benefits beyond the employees retirement are not intended to be exempt unless specifically stated in the Act.

3. The CIT(Appeals) erred in directing the Assessing Officer to allow exemption u/s.10(12) of the Act on the accumulated PF withdrawn after a period of nine years, without appreciating that the assessee had not made any claim of exemption u/s. 10(12), in the return of income. Also, the CIT(A) erred in placing reliance on sub-rule 3 of Rule 5 to Schedule – IV of Recognised Provident Fund, without appreciating that they are the rules applicable to the Fund and Trust to be followed so as to get the recognition as Recognised Provident Funds.

4. The CIT (Appeals) erred in deleting the addition made under the head income from other sources, of the interest received on accumulated balance of PF, without considering clause (f) of Rule 2 in Part-A of Schedule IV, wherein it is clarified that the accumulated balance due to an employee will be only till the date of his cessation to be an employee of the employer, maintaining the fund and as no interest income has been offered by the assessee in any of the assessment years from 2003-04 to 2012-13, the interest portion on the maturity amount withdrawn by the assessee becomes income of the assessee, to be taxed under the head ‘income from other sources.

5. The CIT(Appeals) erred in holding the assessee to be eligible for exemption u/s.54 by considering the issues to be beyond the control of the assessee, without appreciating that the assessee was not able to meet the conditions prescribed u/s.54 and was clearly not able to complete the construction within the period of 3 years from the date of sale of original property.

6. The CIT (Appeals) erred in giving relief to the assessee inasmuch as holding the assessee to be eligible for exemption u/s.54 only by adjudicating the issue of non-completion of project within the prescribed time limit and without adjudicating on the several other issues considered by the Assessing Officer for concluding the assessee to be ineligible for the benefit of exemption u/s.54.

7. For these and such other grounds that may be urged at the time of hearing, it is humbly prayed that the order of the CIT(A) be reversed and that of the Assessing Officer restored.

8. The appellant craves leave to add, to alter, to amend or delete any of the grounds that maybe urged at the time of hearing of appeal.”

4. The assessee has also filed cross objections (‘CO’) which are as under:

“1. The order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is bad in law to the extent that the ground raised on re-computation of the long-term capital gain by reducing the cost of acquisition by the Assessing Officer has not been dealt at all by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) may be directed to consider this ground being appealed before him.

2. The order passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) is bad in law to the extent that there is no finding on the ground taken for not giving full credit of TDS by the Assessing Officer. On proper appreciation of facts of the case and the evidence available, the appellant is eligible for TDS credit as claimed in the return of income same is to be allowed without any variation.

3. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in not giving the specific finding while granting relief with respect to addition made by the Assessing Officer on account of Interest accrued on accumulated balance of Provident Fund.”

Revenue’s appeal and the assessee’s C.O. are disposed hereunder. In the course of hearing, the ld AR filed a paper book (pgs 1 to 207) and case law compilation (pgs 208 to 289) which have been perused and considered.

5. Grounds No: 1, 7 and 8 – Revenue’s appeal

5.1 The grounds 1,7 and 8 of Revenue’s appeal (supra), being general in nature, no adjudication is called for thereon.

6. (Ground Nos. 2 to 4 – Revenue’s appeal) (Cross Objections No: 3 – Assessee’s C.O ) Accumulated Balance in Provident Fund

6.1 In grounds 2 to 4 (supra), Revenue contends that the ld CIT(A) erred in granting relief to the assessee with respect to the withdrawal of the accumulated balance in the PF account as the benefit u/s 10(12) of the Act; which is available to employees only and that too only up to the date of his cessation to be employee of the employer as per clause (f) of Rule 2 in part A of schedule IV. The assessee in the case on hand had ceased to be an employee of Wipro Ltd., in the April, 2002 itself and the accumulated PF amount was withdrawn after a period of 9 years i.e., on 11/4/2011. The assessee had also not made any claim for exemption u/s 10(12) of the Act in the return of income filed for the year under consideration. It was also contended that the ld CIT(A), had erred in granting relief to the assessee by relying on the sub-rule 3 of Rule 5 to Schedule-IV of Recognized Provident Fund, without appreciating that they are rules applicable to and to be followed by the Fund and Trust in order to get recognition as Recognized Provident Funds. It was further contended that the ld CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition made under head ‘income from other sources’ of the interest received on accumulated balance of PF, without considering clause (f) of Rule 2 in Part-A of Schedule-IV, wherein it is clarified that the accumulated balance due to an employee will be only up to the date of cessation of employment. In the case of the assessee, employment with Wipro Ltd., ceased in the financial year 2002-03. The interest portion on the maturity amount withdrawn after retirement which becomes taxable in the hands of the assessee under the head ‘income from other sources’ has not been declared and offered to tax by the assessee in the asst. years 2003-04 to 2012-13. The ld DR for Revenue was heard in support of the grounds raised and submitted that since the assessee did not make the claims for exemption u/s. 10(12) of the Act in the return of income, the same is not allowable in terms of the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Goetze (India) Ltd. v. CIT [2006] 284 ITR 383.

6.2 Per contra, the ld AR reiterated the submissions put forth before the ld CIT(A) (placed at pgs. 69 to 76 of paper book) which are extracted hereunder:—

3.1 The appellant was an employee of Wipro Ltd.,

3.2 The appellant retired from this company on April 1, 2002 after serving the company approximately for a period of 26 years (from 15th May 1976 to 31st March 2002).

3.3 In the course of employment the appellant was a member of Company’s Provident Fund that was an exempted fund under the appropriate provisions of the Act. Contributions out of salary were being made by the appellant as an employee and also by the employer to the Employee Provident Fund (‘EPF’) Account of the employee. The amount of contributions accumulated in the EPF account together with interest as on date of retirement was Rs.37,93,588/-.

3.4 The appellant did not immediately withdraw the accumulated balance in EPF account claimable by him on the date of retirement. The appellant had withdrawn the sum of Rs. 82,00,783/- from EPF account on 11.04.2011.

3.6 The amount so withdrawn was credited to capital account of the appellant and no income was offered to tax by the appellant on this credit in the capital account.

3.7 In the course of assessment proceedings the appellant was asked about the credit in capital account of Rs. 82,00,783/-.

3.8 The appellant submitted in course of assessment proceedings that he served as an employee of Wipro Ltd. till March,2002 and that amount was withdrawn from EPF account on 11.04.2011. The appellant further submitted that the amount so withdrawn was exempt u/s.10 (12) of the Act.

3.9 The appellant submitted that the Wipro EPF was a recognized Provident Fund. The appellant took support of Rule 4 and Rule 5 of Part A of Schedule 4 to Income Tax Act, to buttress his point.

3.10 The Assessing Officer however, added the amount of Rs.37,93,588/- to the income on the ground that the claim for exemption u/s. 10(12) is a new claim and since the claim was not made in the return of income, the same cannot be now done in the course of assessment proceedings.

3.11 The Assessing Officer has at Page 16 prepared a chart showing calculation of interest accumulated every year and has worked it out from the date of retirement till the date of withdrawal. The accumulated interest so calculated was Rs.44,07,195/- . The Assessing officer further went ahead to say that the provisions of Section 10(12) of the Act would not apply to this interest, since reading 10(12) along with Rule 2(F) in Part A of the 4th Schedule, the exemption is available only up to the date on which the person ceases to be an employee of the employer maintaining the fund.

3.12 Therefore, overriding the objections of the appellant, the addition is made.

3.13 The relevant provisions of law are as under:-

Sub-section 12 of Section 10,

“The accumulated balance due and becoming payable to an employee participating in a Recognized Provident Fund to the extent provided in Rule 8 of Part A of the 4th Schedule.”

3.14 Rule 8 of Part A of the 4th Schedule reads as under:-

“The accumulated balance due and becoming payable to an employee participating in a Recognized Provident Fund shall be excluded from the computation of his total income —

(i) If he has rendered continuous service with his employer for a period of 5 years or more

Or

(ii) If, though he has not rendered such continuous service, the service has been terminated for reason of the employee’s ill health or by the contraction or discontinuance of the employer’s business or other cause beyond the control of the employee.

3.15 Dissecting section 10(12) of the Act, one would get the following.

(a) The exemption is for the accumulated balance due and becoming payable

(b) To an employee

(c) Who is participating in a RECOGNISED PROVIDENT FUND

(d) To the extent provided in Rule 8 of Part A of the 4th Schedule

3.16 In 4th schedule Part A the words “employee” and words “accumulated balance” are defined as under:

(b) Employee means an employee participating in a Provident Fund, but does not include a ‘personal or domestic servant”,

(f) “Accumulated balance due to an employee means the balance to his credit, or such – portion thereof as may be claimable by him under the regulations of the fund, on the day he ceases to be an employee of the employer maintaining the fund”

3.17 The words ‘extent provided in Rule 8′ would mean the period of service referred to in Rule 8. This is supported by Circular No. 138, dated 17.06.1974 from which the relevant extract is as under:

“Under rule 8 of Part A of the Fourth Schedule, the amount of the accumulated balance due and becoming payable to an employee on the termination of his employment is excluded from the computation of his taxable income if the employee has rendered continuous service with his employer for a period of 5 years or more, or if the service of the employee are terminated by reason of his ill health or by the contraction or discontinuance of the employer’s business or any other cause beyond the control of the employee. If the accumulated balance due to an employee participating in a recognized provident fund is paid to him otherwise than in the circumstances referred to above, as for instance, in cases where the employee voluntarily resigns from his post before the completion of 5 years’ service with the employer, the amount paid to the employee is brought within the ambit of taxation. In such cases, the employee is required to pay, in addition to the normal tax payable by him, an amount equal to the difference between the aggregate tax which would have been payable by him if certain tax concessions allowed to employees participating in recognized provident funds had not been allowed to the employee in the years in which he made contributions to the fund and the aggregate tax actually paid by him for these years. Since the accumulated balance due to an employee becomes payable on the day he ceases to be an employee of the employer maintaining the fund, the effect of this provision is that the tax relief allowed to an employee is withdrawn in cases where the amount of the accumulated balance due to him is transferred from the recognized provident fund maintained by the former employer to a recognized provident fund maintained by the new employer. In view of the position that an employee does not receive any immediate benefit by the mere transfer of the amounts to his credit from one account to another and remains in virtually the same position as he would have been, had former employer, the withdrawal of the tax relief in such cases results in hardship to the employees. With a view to avoiding this hardship, the Finance Act, 1974 has made a specific provision in the aforesaid rule 8 to secure that exemption from income tax is not withdrawn in such cases. Further, it has also been provided that in cases where the accumulated balance due and becoming payable to an employee includes any amount transferred from any other recognized provident fund maintained by his former employer, then, in computing the period of continuous service of 5 years for the purposes of the aforesaid provision, the continuous service rendered by the employee with such former employer will also be taken into account.”

3.18 In this connection, it is also relevant to refer to sub-Rule 3 of Rule 5 of Schedule 4. This Rule, which reads as under provides for continuation of the maintenance of the fund, even after the employee ceases to be an employee.

(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in clause (e) or clause (g) of rule 4,

(a) At the request made in writing by the employee who ceases to be an employee of the employer maintaining the fund, the trustees of the fund may consent to retain the whole or any part of the accumulated balance due to the employee to be drawn by him at any time on demand;
(b) Where the accumulated balance due to an employee who has ceased to be an employee is retained in the fund in accordance with the preceding clause, the fund may consist also of interest in respect of such accumulated balance.

3.19 From the reading of the above clause, it is very clear that the above is a Non-obstante clause which overrides Rule 4(e) and 4(g).

3.20 Rule 4(e) defines the composition of the fund which is further accelerated by a reading of Rule 5 (3) a & b to include even the interest accumulated after the person ceases to be an employee.

Clause 4(g) provides that the accumulated balance due to an employee shall be payable on the day he ceases to be an employee. The clause is also overridden by Sub-Rule (3) of Rule 5.

3.21 Reading all the above together it is very clear that the entire amount due in an EPF account whenever drawn is not to be included in the income of the appellant.

3.22 The appellant is entitled for exemption for the reason that he had participated in the fund – There is a provision of continuation of the fund even after he ceases to be an employee – and the total accumulated balance as on date of withdrawal is exempt from tax.

3.23 In a negative way also, it can be proved that the amount so to withdrawn is not taxable.

3.24 Rule 10 of the Part A of 4th Schedule enjoins on the Trustees of the Recognised Provident Fund to deduct tax at source if the amount being withdrawn is taxable in pursuance of Rule 8 of the Part A of the 4th Schedule. in this case, no tax is deducted at source, meaning whereby that the amount withdrawn is not taxable under Income Tax Act.

3.25 A mere non-mentioning of exempt income in the return of income cannot be construed as new claim and therefore the decision of the APEX court in Goetze India P Ltd is not applicable to the case at hand.

3.26 In any case, the appellant further wishes to submit as follows

(a) Under Section 4 of the Act, tax is to be levied on the total income of the previous year:—

(b) Total income is defined in Section 2(45) as the income referred in Section 5 computed in manner laid down in the Act.

(c) Article 265 of the constitution of India reads as under:

“No tax shall be levied or collected except by authority of law”.

(d) Assuming (without admitting) there was an oversight of not mentioning this as Tax- Exempt Income in the relevant year; it is a well-established principle of law that nobody can take advantage of legal mistake committed by anybody. The taxability of a receipt under the Income-tax Act, 1961 depends on / governed by the provisions of the said Act and not on the view which the parties may take as to their rights and liabilities. It is open for an assessee to avail the remedy and point out the mistake, if he is not really liable to tax, even though he might have, by his conduct, acquiesced to the taxability. There can be no estoppel against statute. [CIT v. Bharat General Reinsurance Co. Ltd [1971] 81 ITR 303 (Delhi), Asit Kumar Ghose v. Commissioner of Agricultural Income Tax [1952] 22 ITR 177 (Cal), Impsat P. Ltd. v. ITO[2005] 276 ITR (AT) 136 ITAT (Del)]

(e) In Kedarnath Jute Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1971] 82 ITR 363 (SC), it was held as under:

We are wholly unable to appreciate the suggestion that if an assessee under some misapprehension or mistake fails to make an entry in the books of account and although, under the law, a deduction must be allowed by the Income Tax Officer, the assessee will lose the right of claiming or will be debarred from being allowed that deduction. Whether the asessee is entitled to a particular deduction or not will depend on the provision of Law relating thereto and not on the view which the assessee might take of his rights nor can the existence or absence of entries in the books of account be decisive or conclusive in the matter.

(fSail DSP YR Employees Association 1998 v. Union of India [2003] 262 ITR 638 (Cal) – SLP dismissed on 27.02.2004 1266 ITR (St.) 109], it was held as under:

What is not otherwise taxable cannot become taxable because of admission of the assessee. Nor can there be any waiver of the right otherwise admissible to the assessee in law. The chargeability is not dependent on the admission of or waiver, by the assessee. Chargeability is dependent on the charging section, which needs to be strictly construed.

(g) In CIT v. D.K.B. and Co. [2000] 243 ITR 618 (Ker) it was held as under:

It is the settled position in law that there cannot be estoppel against a statute. There is no provision in the statute which permits a compromise assessment. The above position was indicated by the apex court in Union of India v. Banwari Lal Agarwal [1999] 238 ITR 461.

(h) In CIT v. Dharmadeepti [1999] 236 ITR 397 (Ker), it was held as under:

That the assessee consistently claimed exemption under section 11 notwithstanding section 13(1) (bb) having been inserted in the Act. Therefore, when the assessee gave up a particular ground, the Tribunal was justified in considering the ground on the merits on the basis that there was no estoppel against law.

(i) In Dy. CIT v. Quark Systems (P.) Ltd. [2010] 4 ITR (Trib.) 606 ITAT [Chandigarh] SB, it was held as under:

The taxpayer is not estopped from pointing out a mistake in the assessment though such mistake is the result of evidence adduced by the taxpayer.

When substantial justice and technical considerations are pitted against each other, the cause of substantial justice deserves to be preferred, for the other side cannot claim to have a vested right in injustice being done due to some mistakes on its part.

Proceedings before the tax authorities are not adversarial proceedings and the assessee should not be placed at under advantage because of his inadvertent and bona fide mistakes. 3.27 From the above, it is very clear that the entire amount withdrawn from PF account is not liable for taxation and the addition made on both the counts is to be deleted in entirety.’

6.3.1 We have heard the rival contentions and perused and carefully considered the material on record: The facts of the case as emanate from a perusal of the records in that the assessee, was an employee of Wipro Ltd., and retired from the company on 1/4/2002. As on the date of retirement the accumulated provident fund balance of contributions plus interest was 37,93,588/-. The assessee did not withdraw the same immediately, after retirement, but withdrew the accumulated balance of Rs. 82,00,783/- from the EPF account on 11/4/2011, which comprised of Rs. 37,93,588/- the balance on the date of retirement plus interest of Rs.44,07,195/- on the accumulated balance from 1/4/2002 (the date of assessee’s retirement) up to 11/4/2011; the date of withdrawal. These details not disclosed by the assessee but were ascertained by the Assessing Officer in the course of assessment proceedings when he required the assessee to explain the credit of Rs. 82,00,783/- to his capital account. At this juncture, the assessee claimed that the aforesaid amount so withdrawn was exempt u/s 10(12) of the Act. The AO was of the view that since the claim for exemption u/s 10(12) of the Act was not made by the assessee in the return of income, the assessee’s claim cannot be considered in assessment proceedings in view of the decision of Goetze (India) Ltd., (supra).

6.3.2 A perusal of the provision of section 10(12) of the Act and the definition of ‘Accumulated Balance’ in Part A of 4th Schedule clearly indicates that the exemption u/s 10(12) of the Act is available only to a person who being an employee withdraws the accumulated fund from the PF account as on the date of retirement or termination of employment. In these factual and legal circumstances, as laid out above, we are of the considered opinion that the withdrawal to the extent of the accumulated balance (viz., contributions plus interest) up to the retirement of the assessee’s i.e., 1/4/2002 of Rs.37,93,888/- is eligible for exemption u/s 10(12) of the Act . In this view of the matter, to this extent, the impugned order of the ld CIT(A) is upheld. The ld DR had placed reliance on the decision of the Hon’ble Apex in the case of Goetze (India) Ltd.,(supra) for denial of the assessee’s claim, since it was not put forth before the AO in the return of income filed. We are not inclined to accept this argument put forth by the ld DR for Revenue. It has been held in the decisions of various Hon’ble Courts that the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Goetze (India) Ltd., (supra) is in respect of the claims before the AO and does not place fetters on the appellate authorities to entertain fresh claims put forth by the assessee which are part of the record and/or are a material for the purpose of assessing the correct tax liability in accordance with law. In coming to this view, we, inter alia, draw support from the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1998] 229 ITR 383. We are therefore of the view that it was incumbent on the ld CIT(A) to examine the assessee’s claim which was admittedly put forward before the AO in the course of assessment proceedings.

6.3.3 However in respect of the accrued interest of Rs. 44,07,195/-from 1/4/2002 to 11/4/2011 on the accumulated balance of Rs.37,93,588/- as on 1/4/2002, the same has accrued to the assessee after he retired from Wipro Ltd., and it cannot be said that such accrual of the interest was qua an employee. The exemption u/s 10(12) of the Act is limited to the accumulated balance due and payable to an employee up-to the date of retirement/end of employment. In this view of the matter, we are of the considered opinion that the accumulated interest of Rs.44,07,195/- post-retirement of the assessee on 1/4/2002 is not eligible for exemption u/s 10(12) of the Act. We therefore hold that the AO was right in holding that the said interest was exigible to tax in the assessee’s hands. However, since the assessee is following mercantile system of accounting and to bring to tax the correct income in the hands relevant period of accrual, we direct the AO to bring this amount of accrued interest of Rs.44,07,195/- on P.F balance for the period 1/4/2002 to 11/4/2011 to tax in the assessee’s hands in the respective asst. years in which the interest accrued, as per the working in the table in page 15 of the order of assessment, which is extracted hereunder:—

F.Y P.F.A/c cumulative balance at the F.Y.starting Total Interest taxable Rate of Interest on total balance.
2002-03 37,93,588/- 3,60,391/- 9.5%
2003-04 41,53,978/- 3,94,628/- 9.5%
2004-05 45,48,606/- 4,32,118/- 9.5%
2005-06 49,80,724/- 4,23,361/- 8.5%
2006-07 54,04,086/- 4,59,347/- 8.5%
2007-08 58,63,433/- 4,98,392/- 8.5%
2008-09 63,61,825/- 5,40,755/- 8.5%
2009-10 69,02,580/- 5,86,720/- 8.5%
2010-11 74,89,300/- 7,11,484/- 9.5%
2011-12 82,00,783/-

Consequently, grounds 2 to 4 of Revenue’s appeal and C.O No.3 are disposed of as indicated above.

7. (Ground Nos.5 & 6 of Assessee’s appeal Cross-objection No.1 Computation of LTCG and Exemption u/s 54 of the Act)

7.1 In these grounds (supra), the Revenue assails the order of the ld CIT(A) in allowing the assessee exemption u/s 54 of the Act without appreciating that the assessee was not able to complete the construction within three years from sale of original property, and holding that this was only due to issues beyond the control of the assessee.

7.2.1 The facts of the matter are, that in the year under consideration, the assessee had sold a property in Pune i.e on 3/11/2011, for a consideration of Rs.4,50,90,000/-. In respect of this sale, the assessee computed the capital gains thereon at Rs.2,91,94,197/-. The entire LTCG of Rs.2,91,94,197/- was claimed by the assessee as exempt u/s 54 of the Act, stating that the investment in acquisition of the new property was up to Rs.3,00,00,000/-. While computing the LTCG, the assessee considered the original cost of acquisition of the property sold at Rs.94,14,000/- which was indexed to Rs.1,53,95,813/-. The AO, however, considered the original cost of the property sold at Rs.78,97,637/- which was indexed to Rs.1,29,15,927/-.

7.2.2 The AO also denied the assessee’s claim for exemption u/s 54 of the Act mainly on the ground that the construction of the new house property was not completed within a period of three years from the date of sale of the Pune property. The AO was also of the view that since the Pune property was sold on 3/11/2011 and that the assessee had commenced investing in new property on 15/10/2010 itself; which was more than one year prior to the date of sale of the said property; the assessee was not entitled for exemption u/s. 54 of the Act for construction of the new house.

7.2.3 On appeal, the ld CIT(A) allowed the assessee’s claim for exemption u/s. 54 of the Act on the ground that exemption sections are to be construed liberally and the assessee having done whatever was legally required of him was entitled to exemption u/s. 54 of the Act.

7.3 The ld DR for Revenue was heard in support of the grounds raised (supra). According to the ld DR since the construction of the new house has not been completed within the eligible period of 3 years from the date of sale of the old property, the assessee has failed to comply with the provisions of law and hence is not eligible for exemption u/s. 54 of the Act. The ld DR further contended that since the construction of the new house commenced more than one year prior to the date of sale of the old property, the assessee is not eligible for exemption.

7.4.1 The sum and substance of the arguments put forth by the ld AR for the assessee, briefly, are that :—

(i) The assessee, after sale of original asset at Pune on 3/11/2011, had entered into a MoU with Chalet Hotels (P) Ltd., for construction/purchase of an apartment No: B-1101 on the 11th floor of a project called Vinarea, Koramangala, Bangalore for a total consideration of Rs. 3,24,52,841/-which the builder was to complete and give possession by June, 2013.
(ii) The assessee had invested Rs. 2,26,82,097/- towards the aforesaid flat.
(iii) Since the ‘Vinarea’ project was one of high rise buildings, necessary NoC was obtained from HAL on 28/10/2011 (copy placed at page 122 of paper book) and accordingly the builder had constructed 17 storey’s of the building by Oct, 2012.
(iv) Thereafter, vide letter dated 16/8/2013, HAL unilaterally and without notice cancelled the NoC (copy of letter at pgs 123-124 of the Paper Book).
(v) The Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka vide order dated 23/10/2013 (a copy placed at pgs 125 to 129 of paper book) prohibited the builder from any further construction, pending decision on the NoC.
(vi) The Builder, while filing an appeal against the withdrawal of NoC by HAL also offered to conduct a fresh, independent survey. A single Judge Bench of the Hon’ble High Court passed an order, dated 9/9/2014 permitting such an independent survey (copy placed at pgs 130 to 190 of paper book).
(vii) On appeal by HAL against the aforesaid order of the single Judge bench of the Hon’ble High Court, a division Bench of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court vide order dated 3/9/2015 (copy placed at pgs. 151 to 207 of paper book) upheld the order of the single Judge, dated 9/9/2014.

7.4.2 It was the contention of the ld AR that in view of the aforesaid peculiar and abnormal situation and events which were beyond the control of the assessee, the assessee could not take the permission of the apartment by 3/11/2014, i.e., the date on which the three year period would expire from the date of the sale of the original asset on 3/11/2011. It was submitted that the assessee has done whatever was possible from his side and therefore the asessee should not be denied the benefit of exemption u/s. 54 of the Act for no fault on his part. In support of the above contentions, the ld AR of the assessee has inter alia, cited/placed reliance on the following judicial pronouncements:—

(i) ITO v. Bina Gupta [IT Appeal No: 4074 (Delhi) of 2012] wherein the view, that the assessee cannot be penalized and denied the benefit u/s 54/54F of the Act for the default by the builder which is beyond the control of the assessee, was upheld.
(ii) CIT v. R.L. Sood [2000] 245 ITR 727 (Delhi);
(iii) CIT v. Smt. B.S. Shanthakumari [2015] Kar.):
(iv) CIT v. Sambandam Udaykumar [2012]45 ITR 389 (Kar.):
(v) CIT v. Sardarmal Kothari [2008] 302 ITR 286 (Mad).

The ld AR for the assesee contends, that in view of the ratio of the above judicial pronouncements, despite the non-completion of the construction of the new property by the builder, the assessee would be entitled to the benefit of exemption u/s. 54 of the Act.

7.4.3 With respect to the exemption claimed u/s. 54F of the Act on account of construction of the new house, the ld AR submitted that what was material was not the dates of payment but that the event of construction should be completed after the date of sale of the original amount. In support of the proposition, the ld. AR placed reliance, inter alia, on the following judicial pronouncements:—

(i) CIT v. J.R. Subramanya Bhat [1986]  (Kar.);
(ii) CIT v. V. Pradeep Kumar [2006] (Mad.);
(iii) CIT v. H.K. Kapoor [1998] 234 ITR 753 (All).

7.5.1 We have heard the rival contentions and perused and carefully considered the material on record. It is apparent from the facts of the case as mentioned (along with copies of corroborative documentary evidence) and discussed above from para 7.1 to 4.4.3 of this order (supra) that the non-completion of the construction the flat by the builder within the stipulated period is beyond the control of the assessee. In our considered opinion, in view of the decision of the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Smt. B.S. Shanthakumari (supra) and Sambandam Udaykumar (supra) the assessee cannot be denied exemption u/s 54 of the Act to the extent of investment in the new property, even though the construction of the new asset is not completed within the eligible period of 3 years for the date of sale/transfer of the original asset. With respect to the amount invested in construction of the new property before the date of transfer of the original asset, it is well settled law that the amount invested within one year before the date of transfer of the original asset is to be allowed exemption u/s 54 of the Act. From the details of investments for purchase of the new asset as submitted by the assessee, it is stated that the assessee has only invested an amount of Rs.2,26,82,097/- towards construction of the property. The AO is therefore directed to restrict the exemption allowable to the assessee to the actual amount spent on construction after due verification. We hold and direct accordingly. Consequently, Revenue’s ground Nos. 5 and 6 and the assessee’s C.O. ground No. 1 are disposed of as indicated above.

8. Cross Objection – No:2 Short Credit of TDS

8.1 In this ground of cross objection (supra), the assessee contends that the ld CIT(A) has not disposed off the ground raised for directing the AO to grant the assessee full credit for TDS. It was submitted that the assessee had claimed TDS credit of Rs.25,67,776/- in the return of income and the assessee’s grievance is that it has been allowed TDS credit of only Rs.25,09,137/- by the AO. We, therefore, restore this issue to the file of the AO with direction for examination and verification of the assessee’s claim and to grant the assessee the TDS credit entitled to as per law. Consequently, C.O. ground No.2 is allowed for statistical purposes.

9. In the Result, both Revenue’s appeal and the asseessee’s Cross objection for asst year 2012-13 are partly allowed.

Other Income Tax Judgments

The post No Income Tax Exemption for PF interest on accumulated balance after retirement : ITAT appeared first on Tax Heal.



from Tax Heal https://ift.tt/2OgidX2

Goods to be released on indemnity bond if wrong truck no. mentioned in eway bill by mistake : HC

HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD

Rajavat Steels

v.

State of U.P.

ASHOK KUMAR, J.

WRIT TAX NO. 1300 OF 2018

SEPTEMBER  27, 2018

Rahul Agarwal for the Petitioner.

ORDER

 

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State.

2. This writ petition is filed with prayer to quash the notice dated 18.09.2018 passed by respondent no.3 and further to release the goods and the vehicle.

3. Prima facie, this Court finds that on totally frivolous grounds the goods in question are seized by the Mobile Squad-9, Kanpur.

4. The counsel for the petitioners has placed a copy of the circular dated 14.09.2018 being Circular No. 64/34/2018-GST issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, GST Policy Wing which is one of the highest authority, which clearly indicates in Clause 5 that the proceedings under Section 129 of the CGST Act may not be initiated, inter alia, in the situation which are mentioned in the said circular.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on Clause 5(f) of the said circular which provides that in the event on error in one or two digits/characters of the vehicle number the proceedings under Section 129 of the CGST Act may not be initiated.

6. In the instant case, the proceedings under Section 129 of the CGST Act read with Section 20 of the IGST Act are initiated while the goods were proceeded from Kanpur and were to be delivered at the purchaser, who situates at Udhamnagar, Uttrakhand and immediately after proceeding from the business place of the petitioner, the respondent no.4, Mobile Squad Authority has detained the truck and goods at Kalyanpur and initiated the seizure proceeding and has passed the seizure order.

7. The ground for seizing the goods is that in the invoice, E-way bill and weigh slip the Truck number was mentioned being U.P.-78-DN 7983 instead of U.P.-78-DN 7938.

8. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the said mistake was due to inadvertent human error by the person who has prepared the documents including E-way bill, as the vehicle no. is mentioned by him what he has noticed in the tax invoice and further that he has mentioned the same in all other papers/documents subsequent to issuance of invoice.

9. Surprisingly, neither the mobile squad authority nor the appellate authority appreciated the claim of the petitioner that it is due to mistake or human error the vehicle number (particularly last two digits) are mentioned different which in the instant case are 83 in place of 38.

10. This Court is unhappy with the conduct of the authorities and it is nothing but a clear cut case of harassment of the petitioner/dealer.

11. In view of the aforesaid fact, the goods and vehicle are directed to be released forthwith and since the petitioner is a registered dealer, therefore, in the interest of justice, this Court directs the petitioner to furnish the indemnity bond to the extent of the amount of penalty asked/demanded.

12. The writ petition is allowed.

Other GST Judgments

The post Goods to be released on indemnity bond if wrong truck no. mentioned in eway bill by mistake : HC appeared first on Tax Heal.



from Tax Heal https://ift.tt/2SwvSwE

CESTAT deletes Penalty since Delay in Payment of Service Tax was due to Financial Crunch [Read Order]

The Chennai bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has deleted the penalty order passed against a Company by holding that the delay in paying the service tax by them was due to financial crunch. In the instant case, the appellants were paying service tax regularly upto August 2010 except for […]

The post CESTAT deletes Penalty since Delay in Payment of Service Tax was due to Financial Crunch [Read Order] appeared first on Taxscan | Simplifying Tax Laws.



from Taxscan | Simplifying Tax Laws https://ift.tt/2P02dO9

ICAI releases Technical Guide on the functioning of Audit Committee and its Review Checklist

The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India ( ICAI ) has released a Technical Guide on the functioning of Audit Committee and its Review Checklist providing a checklist for review of the Audit Committee. The Technical Guide aims to provide guidance on Duties and Role of the Audit Committee for ensuring its effectiveness. Important Frequently […]

The post ICAI releases Technical Guide on the functioning of Audit Committee and its Review Checklist appeared first on Taxscan | Simplifying Tax Laws.



from Taxscan | Simplifying Tax Laws https://ift.tt/2Q9ofea

Tuesday, October 30, 2018

Profiteering Charges against Amway India dropped for want of Evidence [Read Order]

The National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) has dropped the anti-profiteering charges against Amway India as the investigating authority could not procure any evidence against the respondent-Company. In the instant case, the applicant had contended that the respondent- Company failed to pass the benefit of the reduction in the GST rates from 28% to 18% on selected […]

The post Profiteering Charges against Amway India dropped for want of Evidence [Read Order] appeared first on Taxscan | Simplifying Tax Laws.



from Taxscan | Simplifying Tax Laws https://ift.tt/2EPN65d

New Rule : How Tax dues before GST will be recovered in GST Act : GST Ne...

Services Received by CA Firm from their Associated Firm Abroad Taxable under RCM: CESTAT

The Hyderabad bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), while considering an appeal filed by Pricewaterhouse, has held that that the services rendered by a CA firm in India to their foreign Associate Firm would be subject to Service Tax under Reverse Charge Mechanism. In the instant case, the appellant is […]

The post Services Received by CA Firm from their Associated Firm Abroad Taxable under RCM: CESTAT appeared first on Taxscan | Simplifying Tax Laws.



from Taxscan | Simplifying Tax Laws https://ift.tt/2qkVZKk

Rule 142A of CGST Rules 2017 : Procedure for recovery of dues under existing laws.

Rule 142A of CGST Rules 2017

Summary of Rule 142A of CGST Rules 2017 

Rule 142A of CGST Rules 2017  deals with ” Procedure for recovery of dues under existing laws ” and inserted by Notification No 60/2018 Central Tax : CGST (13th Amendment ) Rules 2018 Dated 30.10.2018 :

Rule 142A of CGST Rules 2017

“142A. Procedure for recovery of dues under existing laws.

(1) A summary of order issued under any of the existing laws creating demand of tax, interest, penalty, fee or any other dues which becomes recoverable consequent to proceedings launched under the existing law before, on or after the appointed day shall, unless recovered under that law, be recovered under the Act and may be uploaded in FORM GST DRC-07A electronically on the common portal for recovery under the Act and the demand of the order shall be posted in Part II of Electronic Liability Register in FORM GST PMT-01.

(2) Where the demand of an order uploaded under sub-rule (1) is rectified or modified or quashed in any proceedings, including in appeal, review or revision, or the recovery is made under the existing laws, a summary thereof shall be uploaded on the common portal in FORM GST DRC-08A and Part II of Electronic Liability Register
in FORM GST PMT-01 shall be updated accordingly.”.

 

The post Rule 142A of CGST Rules 2017 : Procedure for recovery of dues under existing laws. appeared first on Tax Heal.



from Tax Heal https://ift.tt/2RrcDDw

Manual GST Refunds : Standard Operating Procedure

Manual GST Refunds

GST Refund Process Flow Chart

Introduction:

Refund module is currently not operational on the common portal of the GSTN causing delay in filing and processing of application for refund electronically. Manual filing of applications/documents/forms pertaining to refund claims has been prescribed to overcome this difficulty and, such applications shall also be processed manually by the jurisdictional proper officers till further order. A new rule 97A has been inserted prescribing such manual filing and processing of refund application and two new forms namely, FORM GST RFD 01A and FORM GST RFD 01B have been introduced in this regard. While FORM GST RFD 01A is the application form for claiming refund manually, FORM GST RFD 01B relates to disposal of such application for refund. Circular No. 17/17/2017 – GST dated 15/11/2017, 24/24/2017 – GST dated 21/12/2017 and 37/11/2018 – GST dated 15/03/2018 have been issued by the CBEC in this regard. Circulars 1/2018 and 2/2018 dated 10-1-2018 have also been issued by the Commissioner, State Tax, in similar lines.

Type of GST Refund:

Explanation: According to Explanation (1) appended to sub-section (14) of Section 54, “refund” includes refund of tax paid on zero-rated supplies of goods or services or both or on inputs or input services used in making such zero-rated supplies, or refund of tax on the supply of goods regarded as deemed exports, or refund of unutilised input tax credit as provided under sub-section (3).

The aforesaid explanation, if elaborated, refers that refund may be claimed under following occasions:

A. refund of tax paid (IGST) on goods exported out of India; or

B. refund of tax paid (IGST) on services exported out of India; or

C. refund of tax paid (IGST) on goods or services supplied to a SEZ developer or a SEZ unit; or

D. refund of unutilised ITC when zero-rated supplies are made without payment of tax i.e., when such supplies are made under Letter of Undertaking or Bond; or

E. refund of tax on the supply of goods regarded as deemed exports; or

F. refund of unutilised ITC on account of inverted tax structure i.e., where credit has accumulated on account of rate of tax on inputs being higher than the rate of tax on output supplies (other than nil rated or fully exempted supplies).

In addition to this, refund may also be claimed in respect of following situations:

G. refund of tax paid on a supply which is not provided, either wholly or partially, and for which invoice has not been issued, or where a refund voucher has been issued;

H. refund of tax wrongfully collected and paid to the Government;

I. the tax and interest or any other amount paid incidence of which has not been passed on to any other person

J. refund of tax paid on inward supplies made by a specialised agency of UNO or any Multilateral Financial Institution and Organisation or Consulate or Embassy of foreign countries or other notified persons

Definitions

1. “zero rated supply” means any of the following supplies of goods or services or both, namely:

(a) Export of goods or services or both; or

(b) Supply of goods or services or both to a Special Economic Zone developer or a Special Economic Zone unit.

[Sub-section (1) of section 16 of the IGST Act]

2. “export of goods”with its grammatical variations and cognate expressions means taking goods out of India to a place outside India;

3. “export of services”means the supply of any service when,––

(i) the supplier of service is located in India;

(ii) the recipient of service is located outside India;

(iii) the place of supply of service is outside India;

(iv) the payment for such service has been received by the supplier of service in convertible foreign exchange; and the supplier of service and the recipient of service are not merely establishments of a distinct person in accordance with Explanation 1 in sec.8.

Supply of services to Nepal and Bhutan whether export of services?

A supply of service can be treated as export of service only when all the conditions given in the definition of “export of services” are fulfilled. Thus, realization of export proceeds in convertible foreign exchange becomes imperative for export of services. However, proceeds against supply of services having place of supply in Nepal or Bhutan are often realized in INR.

In view of above, following notifications have been issued:

  • Supply of services associated with transit cargo to Nepal and Bhutan (landlocked countries) is exempted vide Notification No.31/2017 – Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 29-09-2017.
  • Supply of services having place of supply in Nepal or Bhutan, against payment in Indian Rupees is exempted from tax vide Notification No.42/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 27.10.2017

1. Relevant Date For Filing Of Application For Refund:

Section 54(1) provides that, the application for refund is required to be filed before the expiry of two years from the relevant date which is given as under:

Occasion Relevant Date Remarks
Goods exported by sea or by air The date on which the ship or the aircraft, carrying the goods, leaves India
Goods exported by land The date on which such goods pass the frontier
Goods are exported by post The date of dispatch of goods by the Post Office concerned
Deemed export The date on which the return relating to such deemed export is furnished.
Export of services If supply of services completed before receipt of payment, the date of receipt of payment.

If payment is received in advance prior to issuance of invoice, the date of issue of invoice.

Un utilized ITC End of the tax period / end of the financial year in which such claim for refund arises.
Refund of tax paid on a supply which is not provided Date of payment of tax (point no.G)
Refund of tax and interest or any other amount if the applicant had not passed on the incidence of such tax and interest to any other person Date of payment of tax Refund ≤ Rupees two lakh: a declaration to the effect that the incidence of tax, interest or any other amount claimed as refund has not been passed on to any other person, is to be furnished.

Refund > Rupees two lakh: certificate in Annexure 2 of Form GST RFD 01 issued by a chartered accountant or cost accountant to the effect that the incidence of tax, interest or any other amount claimed as refund has not been passed on to any other person, is to be furnished.

Tax paid on inward supply by UNO or any Multilateral Financial Institution and Organization or Consulate or Embassy of foreign countries. Before the expiry of six months from the last day of the quarter in which such supply was received.

For the purpose of ensuring uniformity, following conditions and procedure are laid down for the manual filing and processing of the refund claims:

2. Refund Of IGST Paid On Goods Exported Out Of India:

2.1 No separate application is required to be filed in this situation as according to rule 96, the shipping bill filed by an exporter shall be treated as an application for refund in such cases.

2.2 However, such application shall be deemed to have been filed only after (i) filing of export manifest or export report covering the number and the date of shipping bills or bills of export; (ii) filing the details in Form GSTR 1for the tax period for which refund is claimed and a valid return in Form GSTR 3B for the last tax period preceding the tax period for which refund application is filed [Refer para 2 of Circular No. 24/24/2017 – GST issued by the CBEC]. In case of mismatches between Form GSTR 1, Form GSTR 3B and shipping bills or bills of export, the same can be amended in Table 9 of Form GSTR 1of the subsequent tax period(s). [Refer para 3 of Circular No. 37/11/2018 – GST issued by the CBEC]

2.3 The persons claiming refund of IGST paid on export of goods or services should not have received (i) supplies considered as deemed exports on which the supplier has claimed refund

[Refer third proviso to rule 89(1) read with Notification No.48/2017 – Central Tax issued by the CBEC & S. R. O. No. 737/2017.—issued by Govt. of GoK or, (ii) supplies for export on which supplier has charged tax at the rate of 0.1% (IGST) in case of inter-state supplies or 0.05%(CGST & SGST) in case of intra-state supplies in terms of Notification No. 40/2017 – Central Tax (Rate), 41/2017 Integrated Tax(Rate) issued by the CBEC & S. R. O. No. 740/2017 issued by Govt. of Kerala [In terms of insertion of sub-rule (9) to rule 96 vide Notification No. 75/2017 – Central Tax issued by the CBEC & S.R.O 140/2018 issued by the Govt. of Kerala.]

2.4 The system designated by the Customs shall process the claim for refund and the bank account of the applicant shall be electronically credited where the applicant is found entitled to get refund.

2.5 Refund may be withheld in terms of sub-section (10) or sub-section (11) of section 54 and where the proper officer of integrated tax at the Customs station receives a request to withhold the payment of refund due from the jurisdictional Commissioner of central tax, State tax or Union territory tax, he shall intimate the applicant and the jurisdictional Commissioner of CT/ST/UT, as the case may be.

2.6 Upon receipt of the intimation, the proper officer of CT/ST/UT shall pass an order for withholding the refund in PART-B of FORM GST RFD07. 2.7 In cases of further sanction to refund of the amount withheld, the proper officer shall pass an order in FORM GST RFD-06.

2.8 Both the orders in PART-B of FORM GST RFD-07 and FORM GST RFD06 shall be passed manually by the proper officer of CT/ST/UT till the refund module is operational on the common portal.

3. Refund Of IGST Paid On Zero-Rated Supply Of Goods To A SEZ Unit Or SEZ Developer Or Zero-Rated Supply Of Services:

3.1 Application is to be filed in FORM GST RFD 01A by the supplier.

3.2 In case of supply of goods to a SEZ unit or developer, application for refund shall be filed by the supplier of goods after such goods have been admitted in full in the SEZ for authorised operations, as endorsed by the specified officer of the Zone.

3.3 In case of supply of services to a SEZ unit or developer, application for refund shall be filed by the supplier of services along with such evidence regarding receipt of services for authorised operations as endorsed by the specified officer of the Zone.

3.4 The supplier is required to file application in FORM GST RFD-01A on the common portal and a print out of the said form shall be submitted before the jurisdictional proper officer. 3.5 The persons claiming refund of IGST paid on zero rated supply of goods or services to a SEZ Unit or Developer or zero-rated supply of services is required to file the details in Form GSTR 1for the tax period for which refund is claimed and a valid return in Form GSTR 3B for the last tax period preceding the tax period for which refund application is filed [Refer para 2 of Circular No. 24/24/2017 – GST issued by the CBEC] In case of mismatches between Form GSTR 1, Form GSTR 3B and shipping bills or bills of export, the same can be amended in Table 9 of Form GSTR 1of the subsequent tax period(s). [Refer para 3 of Circular No. 37/11/2018 – GST issued by the CBEC]

3.6 Application is to be filed before the jurisdictional tax authority to which the taxpayer is assigned.

3.7 If jurisdiction of the registered person is not assigned, he may file application before any of the two authorities (Central or State) along with an undertaking that the claim for refund has been made to only one of the authorities https://taxheal.com.

4. Refund Of Unutilised ITC On Inputs And Input Services Used In Making Zero-Rated Supply:

4.1 This is applicable when zero-rated supply (export or supplies to SEZ developer/SEZ unit) is made without payment of integrated tax under Letter of Undertaking or Bond as prescribed in rule 96A.

4.2 Application shall be filed in FORM GST RFD-01A on the common portal.

4.3 The persons claiming refund of unutilised ITC on inputs and input services used in making zero-rated supply is required to file the details in Form GSTR 1for the tax period for which refund is claimed and a valid return in Form GSTR 3B for the last tax period preceding the tax period for which refund application is filed [Refer para 2 of Circular No. 24/24/2017 – GST issued by the CBEC and] In case of mismatches between Form GSTR 1, Form GSTR 3B and shipping bills or bills of export, the same can be amended in Table 9 of Form GSTR 1of the subsequent tax period(s). [Refer para 3 of Circular No. 37/11/2018 – GST issued by the CBEC }

4.4 The amount claimed as refund shall be debited in the corresponding electronic credit ledger of CT/ST/UT/IT/Cess to the extent of the claim in accordance with sub-rule (3) of rule 86.

4.5 An Acknowledgement Receipt Number (ARN) shall be generated on the common portal as a proof of debit which shall be mentioned in the FORM GST RFD-01A.

4.6 The print out of FORM GST RFD-01A along with a print out of the ARN shall be submitted before the jurisdictional tax authority to which the taxpayer is assigned.

4.7 If jurisdiction of the registered person is not assigned, he may file application before any of the two authorities (Central or State) along with an undertaking that the claim for refund has been made to only one of the authorities.

4.8 The registered persons applying for refund must give an undertaking to the effect that the amount of refund sanctioned would be paid back to the Government with interest in case it is found subsequently that the requirements of clause (c) of sub-section (2) of section 16 read with subsection (2) of sections 42 of the KSGST/CGST Act have not been complied with in respect of the amount refunded. This undertaking should be submitted manually along with the refund claim till the same is available in FORM GST RFD-01A on the common portal.

4.9 In the case of supplies received on which the supplier has availed the benefit of notification No. 48/2017-State Tax/Central Tax dated 18th October, 2017, refund of input tax credit, availed in respect of other inputs or input services used in making zero-rated supply of goods or services or both, shall be granted.

[Newly inserted rule 89(4A) w.e.f. 23/10/2017 vide notification no. SRO 140/2018 & 75/2017 – Central Tax dated 29/12/2017]

4.10 In the case of supplies received on which the supplier has availed the benefit of notification No. 40/2017-State/Central Tax (Rate) dated 23rd October, 2017 or notification No. 41/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 23rd October, 2017, or both, refund of input tax credit, availed in respect of inputs received under the said notifications for export of goods and the input tax credit availed in respect of other inputs or input services to the extent used in making such export of goods, shall be granted

[Newly inserted rule 89(4B) w.e.f. 23/10/2017 vide notification no. SRO.140/2018 & 75/2017 – Central Tax dated 29/12/2017].

4.11 A supplier availing of drawback only with respect to basic customs duty shall be eligible for refund of unutilized input tax credit of central tax / State tax / Union territory tax / integrated tax / compensation cess under the said provision. Refund of eligible credit on account of State tax shall be available even if the supplier of goods or services or both has availed of drawback in respect of central tax.

[Refer para 2.1 of Circular No. 37/11/2018 – GST issued by the CBEC]

4.12 During the processing of the refund claim, the value of the goods declared in the GST invoice and the value in the corresponding shipping bill / bill of export should be examined and the lower of the two values should be sanctioned as refund.

[Refer para 9.1 of Circular No. 37/11/2018 – GST issued by the CBEC )

4.13 The delay in furnishing of LUT may be condoned in cases where it has been established that exports in terms of the relevant provisions have been made and the facility for export under LUT may be allowed on ex post facto basis taking into account the facts and circumstances of each case.

[Refer para 4.1 of Circular No. 37/11/2018 – GST issued by the CBEC]

4.14 The Commissioner may consider granting of extension of time limit for export as provided in rule 96A on post facto basis keeping in view the facts and circumstances of each case as long as goods or services have actually been exported even after a period of three months or one year as the case may be, and in such case payment of integrated tax first and claiming refund at a subsequent date should not be insisted upon . https://taxheal.com.

[Refer para 5.1 of Circular No. 37/11/2018 – GST issued by the CBEC )

4.15 Transitional Credit pertains to taxes paid under the West Bengal Value Added Tax Act 2003 and therefore, cannot be claimed as unutilized input tax credit for the purpose of refund. It should also be ensured that no refund of the amount of VAT credit is granted in case the said amount has been transitioned under GST. Further, refunds of tax paid under the existing law shall be disposed of in accordance with the provisions of the existing law and cannot be claimed as refund of GST.

[Refer para 8 & 10 of Circular No. 37/11/2018 – GST issued by the CBEC ]

In cases where exports have not been made in the period in which the inputs or input services were received and input tax credit has been availed or in cases where exports have been made in a period but without availing of input tax credit in the said period, the exporter at his option, may file refund claim by clubbing successive calendar months / quarters. The calendar month(s) / quarter(s) for which refund claim has been filed, however, cannot spread across different financial years

[Refer para 11 of Circular No. 37/11/2018 – GST issued by the CBEC ]

4.16 If jurisdiction of the registered person is not assigned, he may file application before any of the two authorities (Central or State) along with an undertaking that the claim for refund has been made to only one of the authorities

4.17 The applicant on the basis of the type of refund claimed, shall furnish the documentary evidences, in the statements as appended to FORM GST RFD-01.

Supplies Under Letter Of Undertaking Or Bond

  • Eligibility to export under LUT: The facility of export under LUT has been extended to all registered persons w.e.f. 04/10/2017 who intend to supply goods or services for export without payment of integrated tax except those who have been prosecuted for any offence under the CGST Act/SGST Act or the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 or any of the existing laws and the amount of tax evaded in such cases exceeds two hundred and fifty lakh rupees.
  • Please take note that Notification No. 16/2017-Central Tax dated 7th July, 2017 which extended the facility of export under LUT to status holder as specified in paragraph 5 of the Foreign Trade Policy 2015-2020 and to persons receiving a minimum foreign inward remittance of 10% of the export turnover in the preceding financial year which was not less than Rs. one crore, has been withdrawn w.e.f. 04/10/2017 [Trade Circular 10/2017 dated 11/10/2017; 37/2017 – Central Tax dated 4thOctober, 2017].
  • Validity of LUT: The LUT shall be valid for the whole financial year in which it is tendered.
  • However, in case the goods are not exported within three months (or such further period as may be allowed by the Commissioner) from the date of issue of export invoice and the registered person fails to pay the amount within a period of fifteen days after the expiry of three months (or such further period as may be allowed by the Commissioner), the facility of export under LUT will be deemed to have been withdrawn.
  • The facility of export under LUT shall be restored if the amount is paid subsequently.
  • Exports, during the period from when the facility to export under LUT is withdrawn till the time the same is restored, shall be either on payment of the applicable integrated tax or under bond with bank guarantee.
  • Form for bond/LUT: Till the time FORM GST RFD-11 is available on the common portal, the registered person (exporters) may download the FORM GST RFD-11 from the website of the Central Board of Excise and Customs (cbec.gov.in) and furnish the duly filled form to the jurisdictional Deputy/Assistant Commissioner having jurisdiction over their principal place of business.
  • The LUT shall be furnished on the letter head of the registered person, in duplicate.
  • It shall be executed by the working partner, the Managing Director or the Company Secretary or the proprietor or by a person duly authorised by such working partner or Board of Directors of such company or proprietor.
  • The bond, wherever required, shall be furnished on non-judicial stamp paper of the value as applicable in the State in which the bond is being furnished.
  • Documents for LUT: A self declaration by the exporter to the effect that he has not been prosecuted should suffice to issue LUT.
  • Time for acceptance of LUT/Bond: LUT/bond should be accepted within a period of three working days of its receipt along with the self-declaration by the exporter.
  • If the LUT / bond is not accepted within a period of three working days from the date of submission, it shall deemed to be accepted.
  • Bank guarantee: Since the facility of export under LUT has been extended to all registered persons, bond will be required to be furnished by those persons who have been prosecuted for cases involving an amount exceeding Rupees two hundred and fifty lakhs. A bond, in all cases, shall be accompanied by a bank guarantee of 15% of the bond amount.
  • NOTE: In terms of Circular No. 40/2018 dated 06/04/2018issued by the CBEC
  • The registered person (exporters) shall fill and submit FORM GST RFD-11 on the common portal. An LUT shall be deemed to be accepted as soon as an acknowledgement for the same, bearing the Application Reference Number (ARN), is generated online.
  • No document needs to be physically submitted to the jurisdictional office for acceptance of LUT.
  • An LUT shall be deemed to have been accepted as soon as an acknowledgement for the same, bearing the Application Reference Number (ARN), is generated online. If it is discovered that an exporter whose LUT has been so accepted, was ineligible to furnish an LUT in place of bond as per Notification No. 37/2017-Central Tax, then the exporter’s LUT will be liable for rejection. In case of rejection, the LUT shall be deemed to have been rejected ab-initio.

5. Refund Of Tax On The Supply Of Goods Regarded As Deemed Export:

5.1 Application may be filed either by the recipient or by the supplier.

5.2 In case the supplier is applying for refund, he shall furnish Acknowledgment by the jurisdictional Tax officer of the Advance Authorisation holder or Export Promotion Capital Goods Authorisation holder, as the case may be, that the said deemed export supplies have been received by the said Advance Authorisation or Export Promotion Capital Goods Authorisation holder, or a copy of the tax invoice under which such supplies have been made by the supplier, duly signed by the recipient Export Oriented Unit that said deemed export supplies have been received by it[Notification No. – 49/2017-Central Tax dated 18.10.2017; Notification No 738/2017 ]

5.3 Further, the supplier of deemed export supplies is also required to furnish an undertaking by the recipient of deemed export supplies that he shall not claim the refund in respect of such supplies and that no input tax credit on such supplies has been availed of by him. The undertaking should be submitted manually along with the refund claim.

5.4 Similarly, in case the refund is filed by the recipient of deemed export supplies, an undertaking by the supplier of deemed export supplies that he shall not claim the refund in respect of such supplies is also required to be furnished manually.

5.5 The application shall be accompanied by a statement containing the number of invoices along with such other evidences as may be notified in this behalf.

5.6 The registered persons applying for refund must give an undertaking to the effect that the amount of refund sanctioned would be paid back to the Government with interest in case it is found subsequently that the requirements of clause (c) of sub-section (2) of section 16 read with subsection (2) of sections 42 of the KSGST/CGST Act have not been complied with in respect of the amount refunded. This undertaking should be submitted manually along with the refund claim till the same is available in FORM GST RFD-01A on the common portal.

5.7 Statement in 5B as appended to FORM GST RFD-01A is required to be furnished for claiming refund on supplies declared as deemed exports.

Following supplies of goods have been regarded as deemed export:

  • Supply of goods by a registered person against Advance Authorisation;
  • Supply of capital goods by a registered person against Export Promotion Capital Goods Authorisation;
  • Supply of goods by a registered person to Export Oriented Unit;
  • Supply of gold by a bank or Public Sector Undertaking specified in the notification No. 50/2017-Customs, dated the 30th June, 2017 (as amended) against Advance Authorisation.

[Notification No.-48/2017-Central Tax dated 18.10.2017; Notification SRO 737/2017 ]

6. Refund Of Unutilised Input Tax Credit On Account Of Inverted Tax Structure:

6.1 Application shall be filed in cases where the credit has accumulated on account of rate of tax on inputs being higher than the rate of tax on output supplies (other than nil rated or fully exempt supplies).

6.2 The registered persons applying for refund must give an undertaking to the effect that the amount of refund sanctioned would be paid back to the Government with interest in case it is found subsequently that the requirements of clause (c) of sub-section (2) of section 16 read with subsection (2) of sections 42 of the KSGST/CGST Act have not been complied with in respect of the amount refunded. This undertaking should be submitted manually along with the refund claim till the same is available in FORM GST RFD-01A on the common portal.

6.3 The application for refund in such cases shall accompany statements as appended to GST RFD 01A.

Credit accumulation on account of rate of tax on inputs being higher than rate of tax on output supplies shall be eligible for refund excepting-

(i) nil rated /fully exempt output supplies

(ii) supplies of goods as notified in notification no. : 5/2017 central tax (Rate) 29/2017 -Central Tax (Rate), 44/2017-State Tax (Rate) corresponding state notifications SRO ‘s 364,722, and 744 of 2017.

(iii) supplies of services as notified in notification no. 15/2017-central tax Tax (Rate) :SRO 374/2017 [Construction Services: Point 5(b) Schedule II]

7. The Application For Refund Shall Accompany The Following Documentary Evidences, As Applicable:

7.1 A statement containing the number and date of shipping bills or bills of export and the number and the date of the relevant export invoices, in a case where the refund is on account of export of goods;[Rule 89(2)(b)]

7.2 A statement containing the number and date of invoices and the relevant Bank Realisation Certificates or Foreign Inward Remittance Certificates, as the case may be, in a case where the refund is on account of the export of services;[Rule 89(2)( c)]

7.3 A statement containing the number and date of invoices as provided in rule 46 along with the evidence regarding the endorsement in the case of the supply of goods made to a SEZ unit or a SEZ developer; [Rule 89(2)(d)]

7.4 A statement containing the number and date of invoices, the evidence regarding the endorsement and the details of payment, along with the proof thereof, made by the recipient to the supplier for authorised operations as defined under the Special Economic Zone Act, 2005, in a case where the refund is on account of supply of services made to a SEZ unit or a SEZ developer; [Rule 89(2) (e)]

7.5 A declaration to the effect that the SEZ unit or the SEZ developer has not availed the input tax credit of the tax paid by the supplier of goods or services or both, in a case where the refund is on account of supply of goods or services made to a SEZ unit or a SEZ developer;[Rule 89(2)(f)]

7.6 The registered persons applying for refund must give an undertaking to the effect that the amount of refund sanctioned would be paid back to the Government with interest in case it is found subsequently that the requirements of clause (c) of sub-section (2) of section 16 read with subsection (2) of section 42 of the KSGST/CGST Act have not been complied with in respect of the amount refunded. This undertaking should be submitted manually along with the refund claim till the same is available in FORM GST RFD-01A on the common portal.

7.7 The applicant on the basis of the type of refund claimed shall furnish the documentary evidences, in the following statements (as applicable) as appended to FORM GST RFD-01:

Statement 2 as appended to FORM – GST RFD 01
Refund Type: Exports of services with payment of tax

Sl. No. Invoice Details Integrated tax CESS BRC/ FIRC
Integrated tax and cess involved in debit note, if any
Integrated tax and cess involved in credit note, if Net Integrated tax and
cess (6+7+10 – 11)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Statement 4 as appended to FORM GST RFD-01

Refund Type: On account of supplies made to SEZ unit or SEZ Developer (on payment of tax)

GSTIN of recipient Invoice details Shipping bill /Bill of export/ Endorsed invoice by
SEZ
Integrated tax Cess Integrated tax and cess involved in debit note, if any Integrated tax and cess involved in credit note, if any Net Integrated tax and cess

(8+9+10– 11)

No. Date Value No. Date Taxable value Amt.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Statement 3 as appended to FORM GST RFD-01

Refund Type: Export without payment of tax (accumulated ITC)

Sl. No. Invoice details Goods / Services (G / S) Shipping bill/ Bill of

export

EGM Details BRC/ FIRC
No. Date Value Port code No. Date Ref.

No.

Date No. Date
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Statement- 3A

[rule 89(4)]

Refund Type: Export without payment of tax (accumulated ITC) – calculation of refund amount

Turnover of zero rated supply of goods and services Net input tax credit Adjusted total turnover Refund amount (1×2÷3)
1 2 3 4

Statement- 5 as appended to FORM GST RFD-01

Refund Type: On account of supplies made to SEZ unit or SEZ Developer (without payment of tax)

Sl. No. Invoice details Goods / Services (G/S)
No. Date Value No. Date
1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Statement- 5A [Rule 89(4)]

Refund Type: On account of supplies made to SEZ unit / SEZ developer without payment of tax (accumulated ITC) – calculation of refund amount

Turnover of zero – rated supply of goods and services Net input tax

credit

Adjusted total

turnover

Refund

(1×2÷3)

amount
1 2 3 4

Statement 5B [rule 89(2)(g)]

Refund type: On account of deemed exports

Sl.
No.
Details of invoices of outward supplies in case
refund is claimed by supplier/ Details of invoices of inward supplies in case refund is claimed by recipient
Tax paid
No. Date Taxable value Integrated
Tax
Central
Tax
State Tax /
Union
Territory Tax
Cess
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Statement -1

[rule 89(5)]

Refund Type: ITC accumulated due to inverted tax structure [clause (ii) of first proviso to section 54(3)]

Turnover of inverted rated supply of goods Tax payable on such inverted rated supply of
goods
Adjusted total turnover Net input tax credit Maximum refund amount to be claimed

[(1×4÷3)-2]

1 2 3 4 5

Statement 1A

[rule 89(2)(h)]

Refund type: ITC accumulated due to inverted tax structure [clause (ii) of first proviso to section 54(3)]

Sl. No.
Details of invoices of
inward supplies
received
Tax paid on inward supplies
Details of invoice of
outward supplies
issued
Tax paid on outward supplies
No.
Date
Taxable value
Integrated tax
Central tax
State tax / Union Territory tax
No.
Date
Taxable value
Integrated tax
Central tax
State tax / Union Territory tax
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

LIST OF DOCUMENTS FOR PROCESSING OF FOLLOWING REFUNDS

[Refer para 14 of Circular No. 37/11/2018 – GST issued by the CBEC]

Type of refund Documents
Export of Services with payment of tax (Refund of IGST paid on export of services)
  • Copy of FORM RFD-01A filed on common portal
  • Copy of Statement 2 of FORM RFD-01A
  • Invoices w.r.t. input, input services and capital goods
  • BRC/FIRC for export of services
  • Undertaking / Declaration in FORM RFD-01A
Export (goods or services) without payment of tax (Refund of accumulated ITC of IGST / CGST / SGST / UTGST /Cess)
  • Copy of FORM RFD-01A filed on common portal
  • Copy of Statement 3A of FORM RFD-01A generated on common portal
  • Copy of Statement 3 of FORM RFD-01A
  • Invoices w.r.t. input and input services
  • BRC/FIRC for export of services
  • Undertaking / Declaration in FORM RFD-01A

8. Form GST Rfd-01A: How To Generate Electronically :

8.1 The refund application shall be filed in FORM GST RFD-01A on the common portal.

8.2 The application shall be filed on a monthly basis. However, registered persons who are opting to file FORM GSTR-1 quarterly in terms of notification number 57/2017- Central Tax dated 15.11.2017 & 2032 F.T. dated 15/11/2017 (State Tax) (i.e., tax payers with aggregate turnover up to Rs.1.5 crore in the preceding financial year or the current financial year), shall apply for refund on a quarterly basis. The refund claim for a tax period may be filed only after filing the details in FORM GSTR-1 for the said tax period [Circular No.24/24/2017-GST, dated 21/12/2017; Trade Circular No. 14/2017 dated 21/12/2017].

8.3 The applicant is required to file valid return in FORM GSTR-3B for the last tax period before the one in which the refund application is being filed [Circular No.24/24/2017-GST, dated 21/12/2017; Trade Circular No. 14/2017 dated 21/12/2017].

8.4 In order to file the application in FORM GST RFD-01A, Table (3A) is made available on the common portal i.e. www.gst.gov.in. The applicant who is covered under aforesaid categories and who desires to seek refund shall access the common portal with the appropriate Log-in Id and password and fill up TABLE 3A.

8.5 The process flow diagram follows as:

Login Id > password > Services > Refund > Application for Refund > Select month from drop down > Create application > fill the application > take print > submit printout to the jurisdictional proper officer.

8.6 Once an applicant reaches the Application for Refund page using his credentials he will have the option to choose the appropriate refund type as under:

  • Refund of Excess Balance in Electronic Cash Ledger
  • Refund of ITC on Export of Goods & Services without Payment of Integrated Tax
  • On account of supplies made to SEZ unit/ SEZ developer (without payment of tax)
  • Refund on account of ITC accumulated due to Inverted Tax Structure
  • Recipient of Deemed Exports
  • Refund on account of Supplies to SEZ unit/ SEZ Developer (with payment of tax)
  • Export of services with payment of tax

Upon choosing of the refund type he will have to follow the steps as noted in para 5 above.

8.7 As explained above, the applicant shall fill the appropriate information in table (3A) under the heading> “Computation of Refund to be claimed (Statement 3A)” after creation of the application if he is claiming refund of unutilized input tax credit on account of export of goods and services.

8.8 For better understanding, TABLE 3A is given below:

Table 3A

Turnover of zero-rated supply of goods and services (in Rs.)

(1)

Adjusted total turnover

(3)

Net input tax credit

(2)

Maximum refund amount

((1*2)/3)

(4)

Integrated Tax
Central Tax
State Tax
Cess
Total

8.9 As it appears from the above table the details of Turnover of Zero-rated supply of goods and services is to be filled in column (1) above. The said turn-over of Zero-rated supply may be taken from the column 3.1 (b) of the FORM-GSTR-3B.

The figures of Net input tax credit (ITC) in column (2) of table above may be taken from the column 4(C) of the FORM-GSTR-3B, respectively.

8.10 The applicant can upload the details of Export of Goods and/or services to create Statement 3 in the same “Application for Refund” page or may download the offline utility for the same.

8.11 Once the information as stated above is filled then the figures in column (4) above is required to be determined by using the formula given in rule 89(4) as under:

Refund Amount = (Turnover of Zero rated supply of Goods + Turnover of Zero rated supply of services) x Net ITC / Adjusted Total Turnover.

Where,-

(A) “Refund amount” means the maximum refund that is admissible;

(B) “Net ITC” means input tax credit availed on inputs and input services during the relevant period other than the input tax credit availed for which refund is claimed under sub-rules (4A) or (4B) or both;

(C) “Turnover of zero-rated supply of goods” means the value of zero-rated supply of goods made during the relevant period without payment of tax under bond or letter of undertaking , other than the turnover of supplies in respect of which refund is claimed under sub-rules (4A) or (4B) or both;

(D) “Turnover of zero-rated supply of services” means the value of zero-rated supply of services made without payment of tax under bond or letter of undertaking, calculated in the following manner, namely:-

Zero-rated supply of services is the aggregate of the payments received during the relevant period for zero-rated supply of services and zero-rated supply of services where supply has been completed for which payment had been received in advance in any period prior to the relevant period reduced by advances received for zero-rated supply of services for which the supply of services has not been completed during the relevant period;

(E) “Adjusted Total turnover” means the turnover in a State or a Union territory, as defined under clause (112) of section 2, excluding –

(a) the value of exempt supplies other than zero-rated supplies and

(b) the turnover of supplies in respect of which refund is claimed under sub rules (4A) or (4B) or both, if any, during the relevant period;

(F) “Relevant period” means the period for which the claim has been filed.

Rule 89(4) prior to 23/10/2017:

Refund Amount = (Turn-over of Zero – rated supply of Goods + Turn-over of Zero-rated supply of services) X Net ITC/Adjusted Total Turn-over.

Where,-

(A) “Refund amount” means the maximum refund that is admissible;

(B) “Net ITC” means input tax credit availed on inputs and input services during the relevant period;

(C) “Turnover of zero-rated supply of goods” means the value of zero-rated supply of goods made during the relevant period without payment of tax under bond or letter of undertaking;

(D) “Turnover of zero-rated supply of services” means the value of zero-rated supply of services made without payment of tax under bond or letter of undertaking, calculated in the following manner, namely:- Zero-rated supply of services is the aggregate of the payments received during the relevant period for zero-rated supply of services and zero-rated supply of services where supply has been completed for which payment had been received in advance in any period prior to the relevant period reduced by advances received for zero-rated supply of services for which the supply of services has not been completed during the relevant period;

(E) “Adjusted Total turnover” means the turnover in a State or a Union territory, as defined under clause (112) of section 2, excluding the value of exempt supplies other than zero-rated supplies, during the relevant period;

8.12 After filling the appropriate figures in the table (3A), the amount of refund will get auto populated in the column (4) of the said TABLE. Further, there is another TABLE below where the amount of eligible refund will be calculated.

8.13 For better understanding the TABLE in which the eligible refund will be calculated is given below:

Balance in electronic credit ledger at the end of tax period for which refund is claimed (balance remaining after return for this period is filed) (Rs.) Balance in electronic credit ledger at the time of filing of refund application (Rs.) Refund to be claimed
(Rs.)
Integrated Tax
Central Tax
State Tax
Cess
Total

8.14. The figures in column (2) & (3) of the aforesaid TABLE will get populated automatically. The final amount eligible for refund is required to be given in the column (4) above.

8.15. Statement 1 which is required to be filled up in case of refund due to inverted tax structure and Statement 5A which is required to be filled up in case of refund due to supplies made to SEZ unit/Developer in FORM GST RFD-01A are similar in nature. The subsequent table for calculation of eligible amount of refund in these cases are also similar in nature.

8.16. In case of refund due to inverted tax structure in accordance with section 54(3)(ii) of the SGST/CGST Act 2017 the figures in column (4) of Statement 1 determining the “maximum refund amount” is required to required to be determined by using the formula given in rule 89(5) as under:

Maximum Refund Amount = {(Turnover of inverted rated supply of goods and services) x Net ITC ÷ Adjusted Total Turnover} – tax payable on such inverted rated supply of goods and services.

Where,

(A) “Net ITC” means input tax credit availed on inputs during the relevant period other than the input tax credit availed for which refund is claimed under sub-rules (4A) or (4B) or both; and

(B) “Adjusted Total turnover” means the turnover in a State or a Union territory, as defined under clause (112) of section 2, excluding –

(a) the value of exempt supplies other than zero-rated supplies and

(b) the turnover of supplies in respect of which refund is claimed under sub rules (4A) or (4B) or both, if any, during the relevant period;

(C) “Relevant period” means the period for which the claim has been filed.

Rule 89(5) is amended w.e.f. 18/04/2018 by virtue of West Bengal Goods Services Tax(Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2018 and Central Goods and Services Tax(Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2018[Notification No. 518 F.T. dated 18/04/2018-State Tax & 21/2018–Central Tax dated 29/12/2018]:

Rule 89(5) prior to 18/04/2018:

“In the case of refund on account of inverted duty structure, refund of input tax credit shall be granted as per the following formula –

Maximum Refund Amount = {(Turnover of inverted rated supply of goods) x Net ITC ÷ Adjusted Total Turnover} – tax payable on such inverted rated supply of goods

Explanation.- For the purposes of this sub rule, the expressions “Net ITC” and “Adjusted Total turnover” shall have the same meanings as assigned to them in sub-rule (4).”

8.17. After duly filing the appropriate information the applicant is also required to select from drop-down the Bank Account Number given at the time of filling registration details.

8.18. In case, an applicant desires that, the refund amount be credited in another preferred bank account which is not appearing in the drop down list then the applicant is required to add that bank account by filing amendment to registration record (non-core amendment) form. For this the applicant may go to >Registration>Non-core amendment> and add details including Bank Name, Branch Name, IFSc Code. The facility given for choosing the Bank IFSC may be used so that no error is made while filling information about bank details. Once the Bank details are updated then the refund amount determined as per the provisions of the law will be disbursed and credited to the said preferred Bank account.

8.19. Once the aforesaid steps are followed and application is saved then the message as “Saved successfully” will appear at the top left hand side of the Table (3A). Then the applicant should check the Box for declaration to the effect that the information submitted is true and correct. After doing so the “PROCEED” button will get activated. Pressing the said button will take to the next window, where, after checking the Box for declaration the applicant is required to submit the said application with the Digital Signature Certificate (DSC).

8.20. After successful submission of Table-3A of refund, ARN receipt will be generated. Printout of the same is required to be submitted to the jurisdictional proper officer

9. Processing Of Application For Refund And Disposal Thereof:

9.1 A refund register is required to be maintained in the office of jurisdictional proper officer.

9.2 Once a refund application in FORM GST RFD 01A is received, an entry shall be made in the said register.

9.3 The proper officer can check FORM GSTR-1, FORM GSTR-3B, FORM GSTT1 (Transitional Credit Form) through the process flow diagram follows as: Login Id > password > Services > Taxpayer Account > Record Search > Enter GSTIN > Document typeselect ARN from drop down > Related to: select Return from drop down > Search.

9.4 Balance of electronic credit ledger, electronic cash ledger and electronic liability register as on the date of search can be viewed through the process flow diagram follows as: Login Id > password > Services > Taxpayer Account > Get Taxpayer Details > Enter GSTIN.

9.5 The proper officer shall scrutinize the application for its completeness and if the application is found to be complete, an acknowledgement in FORM GST RFD 02 is to be issued to the applicant within fifteen days from the date of filing of the said application.

SCRUTINY OF APPLICATION FOR REFUND

For the purpose of scrutiny of the application, a check list comprising following particulars may be prepared:

1 Whether the applicant has furnished the return for the relevant period? Yes No
2 Whether IGST paid by the applicant is found to be matched with the return filed? Yes No
3 Whether the application is duly signed, mentioning the name and designation/status of the signatory, in all the required places? Yes No
4 Whether the application is duly filled up (column number 1 to 4 are system populated) in respect of column 5 to 7? Yes No
5 Whether the applicant has furnished information in the relevant Table annexed to the FORM GST RFD 01? (also see the check list ) Yes No
6 Whether the application is filed along with all supporting documents? [See 7.1 – 7.7, 4.1-4.15, 5.1-5.7, 6.1-6.3] Yes No
7 Whether the shipping bill details are found to be in order upon checking through ICEGATE SITE (www.icegate.gov.in)in detailed scrutiny? Yes No

9.6 Upon scrutiny of the application form, if any deficiencies are noticed, the proper officer shall communicate the deficiencies to the applicant in FORM GST RFD-03 within fifteen days from the date of filing the application.

9.7 Deficiency Memo should be complete in all respects and only one Deficiency Memo shall be given.

9.8 The applicant is then required to file a fresh refund application after rectification of such deficiencies using the ARN and debit entry number generated originally. This fresh application would be accompanied with the original ARN, debit entry number generated originally and a hard copy of the refund application filed online earlier.

[Refer para 6 of Circular No. 37/11/2018 – GST issued by the CBEC ]

9.9 Once an application has been submitted afresh, pursuant to a deficiency memo, the proper officer will not serve another deficiency memo with respect to the application for the same period, unless the deficiencies pointed out in the original memo remain unrectified, either wholly or partly or any other substantive deficiency is noticed subsequently

[Refer para 6 of Circular No. 37/11/2018 – GST issued by the CBEC ]

9.10 If the application is not filed afresh within thirty days of the communication of Deficiency Memo, the proper officer shall pass an order in FORM GST PMT-03 and re-credit the amount claimed as refund through FORM GST RFD-01B on the common portal.

9.11 Where the claim for refund on account of zero-rated supply is found to be in order prima-facie, 90% of the total amount of claim shall be refunded provisionally within a period not exceeding seven days from the date of acknowledgement of the application. The order of such refund on provisional basis shall be made in FORM GST RFD-04.

9.12 A payment advice in FORM RFD GST-05 shall be issued thereafter for credit of the refund amount to the bank account of the applicant which is mentioned in his registration particulars as well as in the application for refund.

9.13 If the proper officer is satisfied that a refund is due to the applicant, he shall make an order in FORM GST RFD-06 sanctioning the refund amount which the applicant is found to be entitled within 60 days from the date of receipt of complete application. While making the order in FORM GST RFD-06, the proper officer shall mention following adjustment, if any:

(i) the amount of refund sanctioned on provisional basis;

(ii) amount of refund found inadmissible;

(iii) amount adjusted against outstanding demand;

9.14 The proper may reject the application for refund and pass an order in FORM GST RFD-06. But the application shall be rejected after giving an opportunity of being heard to the applicant.  A notice for rejection of application for refund shall be issued in FORM GST RFD-08 and the applicant is required to furnish a reply in FORM GST RFD-09 within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of the notice.

9.15 The amount of credit rejected has to be re-credited to the credit ledger by way of communication of such through FORM GST RFD 01B in the common portal and pass a rejection order in FORM GST PMT-03.

9.16 If the refund is completely adjusted against any outstanding demand, an order giving details of the adjustment shall be issued in Part A of FORM GST RFD-07.

9.17 Where the refund is withheld by the proper officer, he shall pass an order in Part B of FORM GST RFD-07 informing the applicant the reason for withholding of the refund. 9.18 A supplier availing of drawback only with respect to basic customs duty shall be eligible for refund of unutilized input tax credit of central tax / State tax / Union territory tax / integrated tax / compensation cess under the said provision. Refund of eligible credit on account of State tax shall be available even if the supplier of goods or services or both has availed of drawback in respect of central tax. [Refer para 2.1 of Circular No. 37/11/2018 – GST issued by the CBEC ]

9.19 Summarising the aforesaid proceedings it is reiterated that, all the communications in relation to disposal of application for refund shall be done manually in the prescribed forms as follows, within the prescribed time limit, till the module is operational on the common portal and the same shall be recorded appropriately in the refund register:

Sl. No. Form Details Time limit
1 FORM GST RFD 02 Acknowledgement of application Within 15 days of filing of application
2 FORM GST RFD 03 Deficiency Memo Within 15 days of filing of application
3 FORM GST RFD 04 Provisional refund order Within a period not exceeding 07 days from the date of acknowledgement
4 FORM GST RFD 05 Payment advice
5 FORM GST RFD 06 Refund sanction/rejection order Within 60 days from the date of receipt of complete application
6 FORM GST RFD 07- Part A Order for complete adjustment of refund
7 FORM GST RFD 07 – Part B Order for withholding refund
8 FORM GST RFD 08 Notice for rejection of application for refund
9 FORM GST RFD 09 Reply to FORM GST RFD 08 Within 15 days of receipt of FORM GST RFD 08
10 FORM GST RFD 01B Refund Processing Details on the common portal

10. Check List:

(Put √ marks in the respective box to ascertain whether deficiency memo is required to be issued)

Refund Of IGST Paid On Zero-Rated Supply (Other Than Export Of Goods)

[It covers the following types of refund claims: (a) Export of services on payment of tax, (b) Supplies of goods or services or both to SEZ on payment of tax]

1 Print out of FORM GST RFD 01A Yes No
2 Print out of Acknowledgement Receipt Number (ARN) Yes No
3 Endorsement by the specified officer of the SEZ that goods have been admitted in full in the SEZ for authorised operation (applicable in respect of supply of goods to SEZ) Yes No
4 Endorsement by the specified officer of the SEZ that services have been received in the SEZ for authorised operation (applicable in respect of supply of services to SEZ) Yes No
5 Statement 2 of RFD-01[Applicable for export of services with payment of tax] Yes No
6 Declaration [rule 89(2)(f)] appended to FORM GST RFD 01[That ITC has not been availed by the SEZ unit/developer] Yes No
7 Statement-4 [Applicable for supplies made to SEZ Unit/Developer] Yes No
8 Invoices w.r.t. input, input services and capital goods along with a statement thereof Yes No
9 Undertaking as referred in para 7.6 above Yes No

[Debit of electronic credit ledger is not required]

Refund Of Unutilised Itc On Inputs And Input Services Used In Making Zero-Rated Supply (Supplies Made Under Letter Of Undertaking Or Bond)

1 Print out of FORM GST RFD 01A Yes No
2 Print out of Acknowledgement Receipt Number (ARN) Yes No
3 Statement 3 [Applicable for export without payment of tax(accumulated ITC)] Yes No
4 Statement 3A [Calculation of refund of accumulated ITC on account of export without payment of tax…refer to rule 89(4)] Yes No
5 Statement 5 [Applicable for supplies made to SEZ unit or SEZ Developer without payment of tax] Yes No
6 Statement 5A [Calculation of refund of accumulated ITC on account of supplies to SEZ unit/developer without payment of tax…refer to rule 89(4)] Yes No
7 Endorsement by the specified officer of the SEZ that goods have been admitted in full in the SEZ for authorised operation (applicable in respect of supply of goods) Yes No
8 Endorsement by the specified officer of the SEZ that services have been received in the SEZ for authorised operation (applicable in respect of supply of services) Yes No
9 Declaration [second proviso to section 54(3)] appended to FORM GST RFD 01[That goods exported are not subject to any export duty/drawback have not been availed/refund of IGST paid has not been claimed ] Yes No
10 Invoices w.r.t. input and input services along with a statement thereof Yes No
11 Undertaking as referred in para 5.7 above Yes No

[Debit of electronic credit ledger is required]

Refund Of Tax On The Supply Of Goods Regarded As Deemed Export

1 Print out of FORM GST RFD 01A Yes No
2 Acknowledgment by the jurisdictional Tax officer of the Advance Authorisation holder or Export Promotion Capital Goods Authorisation holder, as the case may be, that the said deemed export supplies have been received by the said Advance Authorisation or Export Promotion Capital Goods Authorisation holder, or a copy of the tax invoice under which such supplies have been made by the supplier, duly signed by the recipient Export Oriented Unit that said deemed export supplies have been received by it (where the applicant is the supplier of deemed export supplies). Yes No
3 Undertaking by the recipient that (i) he shall not claim the refund in respect of such supply, and (ii) input tax credit has not been availed of by him on such supplies (where the applicant is the supplier of deemed export supplies) . Yes No
4 Undertaking by the supplier that he shall not claim the refund in respect of such supply (where the applicant is recipient of deemed export supplies) Yes No
5 Statement 5B [refer to rule 89(2)(g)] Yes No
6 Undertaking as referred in para 6.7 above Yes No

Refund Of Unutilised Input Tax Credit On Account Of Inverted Tax Structure

1 Print out of FORM GST RFD 01A Yes No
2 Print out of Acknowledgement Receipt Number (ARN) Yes No
3 Declaration [section 54(3)(ii)] appended to FORM GST RFD 01[That ITC has not been availed on nil rated/fully exempt supply] Yes No
4 Statement-1 [Calculation of refund of accumulated ITC on account of inverted tax structure…refer to rule 89(5)] Yes No
5 Statement 1A [Details if inward and outward supply…refer to rule 89(2)(h)] Yes No
6 Undertaking as referred in para 7.2 above Yes No
[Debit of electronic credit ledger is required]
Excess balance in Cash Ledger
1 Print out of FORM GST RFD-01A Yes No
2 Print out of Acknowledgement Receipt Number (ARN) Yes No
[Debit of electronic cash ledger is required]

11. Refund Registers To Be Maintained, Disbursal Procedures And Communication Between Central And State Tax Authorities,

11..1 The procedure prescribed in circular 2/2018 and 5/2018 shall be followed.

11.2 In Addition , the following registers shall be maintained by the refund sanctioning authority.

Table 1

Sl. No.
Applicant’s name
GSTIN
Date of
receipt of
application
Period to which the
claim pertains
Nature of refund – Refund of integrated tax paid/Refund of unutilized ITC
Amount
of refund
claimed
Date of issue of
acknowledg
ment in FORM GST
RFD-02
Date of
receipt of
complete
application
(as mentioned
in FORM
GST RFD02)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Table 2

Date of issue of Deficiency Memo in FORM GST RFD-03 Date of receipt of reply from the applicant Date of issue of provisional refund order in FORM
GSTRFD-04
Amount of refund claimed Amount of provisional refund sanctioned Date of issue of Payment Advice in FORM GST RFD-05
CT ST/UTT IT CESS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Table 3

Date of issue of notice, if any for rejection of refund in FORM GST REF-08
Date of receipt of reply, if any to SCN in FORM GST RFD- 09
Date of issue of Refund sanction / rejection order in FORM GST RFD-06
Total amount of refund sanctioned
Date of issue of Payment Advice in FORM GST RFD-05
Amount of refund
rejected
Date of issue of order for adjustment of sanctioned refund / withholding refund in FORM GST RFD-07
CT
ST/UTT
IT
CESS
CT
ST/UTT
IT CESS
CESS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

11.3 In case of refund claim for the balance amount in the electronic cash ledger, upon filing of FORM GST RFD-01A as per the procedure laid down in Para 2.4 of Trade Circular No. 12/2017 dated 15.11.2017 and Circular No. 17/17/2017-GST dated 15.11.2017, the amount of refund claimed shall get debited in the electronic cash ledger.

11.4 In order to facilitate sanction of refund amount of Central Tax and State Tax, all the District Deputy Commissioners are nominated as Nodal Officers of concerned District for the purpose of liasoning with their counterparts through a dedicated email id. As informed by the Central Tax Authorities, all the Divisional Deputy/Assistant Commissioners of Thiruvananthapuram Zone were nominated by the Central Tax, Central Excise and Customs Authorities for the above pupose.

11.5 A dedicated email id for communication with Central GST Ofifcers is created as “refund.sgst@kerala.gov.in. The details of email id and password will be communicated to all Nodal Officers of State GST Department seperately. The CBEC had created a dedicated email id for the above purpose asrefund.cgstkerala@gov.in

11.6 All the refund orders issued by State GST Authorities shall be communicated to the concerned counter part by email from email id “refund.sgst@kerala.gov.in” to the central mail id “refund.cgstkerala@gov.in” within 7 (seven) working days for the purpose of payment of the relevant sanctioned refund amount of tax or cess as the case may be.

Frequently Asked Questions On Refund

1. I have availed of drawback in respect of basic customs duty only. Am I eligible for refund of Central Tax?

A. A supplier availing of drawback only with respect to basic customs duty shall be eligible for refund of unutilized input tax credit of central tax / State tax / Union territory tax / integrated tax / compensation cess. Refund of eligible credit on account of State tax shall be available even if the supplier of goods or services or both has availed of drawback in respect of central tax.

2. I have committed an error while entering the details of an invoice / shipping bill / bill of export in Table 6A or Table 6B of FORM GSTR-1; can I rectify the same? Will it be taken into cognizance for processing of refund if rectification is allowed?

A. An error in the details of invoice / shipping bill / bill of export in Table 6A or Table 6B of FORM GSTR-1 of earlier period can be rectified in Table 9 of FORM GSTR-1 of a subsequent period.

It has been advised in Circular No. 37/11/2018 – GST issued by the CBEC that, while processing refund claims on account of zero rated supplies, information contained in Table 9 of FORM GSTR-1 of the subsequent tax periods should be taken into cognizance, wherever applicable.

3. Can deficiency memo be issued more than once with respect to a refund claim?

A. Deficiency memo can be issued only once for one refund application and once such a memo has been issued, the applicant is required to file a fresh refund application, manually in FORM GST RFD-01A. Further, once an application has been submitted afresh, pursuant to a deficiency memo, another deficiency memo will not be served with respect to the application for the same period, unless the deficiencies pointed out in the original memo remain unrectified, either wholly or partly or any other substantive deficiency is noticed subsequently.

4. I have transitional credit. Can I claim refund of that?

A. Transitional credit pertains to taxes paid under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act 2003, the same cannot be said to have been availed during the relevant period (period for which refund claim has been filed) and thus, cannot be treated as part of ‘Net ITC’ for the calculation of refund.

5. There is a discrepancy between values of GST invoice and shipping bill/bill of export? How refund will be processed?

A. During the processing of the refund claim, the value of the goods declared in the GST invoice and the value in the corresponding shipping bill / bill of export would be examined and the lower of the two values would be sanctioned as refund.

6. An exporter has made (a) exports upon payment of IGST as well as (b) without payment of IGST during a particular month. He has made payment of IGST by debiting his e-credit ledger. What is required to be done while processing his refund claim of unutilized ITC in respect of exports without payment of IGST?

A. The exporter is not entitled to get refund of the amount debited from e-credit ledger for payment of IGST as refund of unutilized ITC in respect of exports without payment of IGST since refund of IGST paid on goods exported would be processed by the system designated by Customs. In other words, refund of unutilized ITC is not admissible to the extent of input tax credit utilized(debited from e-credit ledger) for making payment of IGST on goods exported.

Disclaimer: The Standard Operational Procedure(SOP) provided in this document is intended only for informational purpose to provide a general overview and the document is not to be treated as legal advice or opinion. For greater details, you are requested to refer to the respective CGST/SGST/UTGST/IGST Acts, Rules and Notifications issued from time to time and to pursue actions accordingly.

This Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) is clarificatory in nature and not meant for legal interpretation of provisions of relevant acts and rules.

Note: [With effect from 23/10/2017, refund of IGST paid on goods or services exported out of India is not allowable if the applicant has received supplies on which the supplier has availed the benefit of notification No. 48/2017-Central Tax dated 18th October, 2017 or notification No. 40/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 23rd October, 2017 or notification No. 41/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 23rd October, 2017 (vide notification no. 2313 F.T. dated 29/12/2017 & 75/2017 – Central Tax dated 29/12/2017)]

Source-

1. https://ift.tt/2JxZiqlcontent/uploads/2018/06/MANUAL_REFUNDS_IN_GST_SOP.pdf

2. https://ift.tt/2JxZiqlcontent/uploads/2018/06/GST_REFUND_PROCESS_FLOW.pdf

 

The post Manual GST Refunds : Standard Operating Procedure appeared first on Tax Heal.



from Tax Heal https://ift.tt/2DeErIa